* Powered By Google

Version 1.0 Nov 14, 2009

PrimusLabs Audit (111969)
Ranch V07.04 Rev. 1
Customer(s)NewStar Fresh Foods, LLC
    Contact:Thea Eubanks
    Address: P.O. Box 5999
    Salinas California 93901
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-784-6646 Fax Number: 831-758-7876
    Email(s):jbautista@newstarfresh.com
Pacific International Marketing/Dynasty Farms
    Contact: Sharan Lanini
    Address: P.O. Box 3737
    Salinas California 93912
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-755-1398 Fax Number: 831-422-0960
    Email(s):Aanderson@pim4u.com;Liliana@pim4u.com;vinny@pim4u.com
Classic Salads/Classic Baby Vegetable
    Contact:Wolfgang Speer
    Address: 100 Harrington Road
    Salinas California 95706
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-763-1500 Ext: 107
    Email(s):wspeer@classicsalads.com
Grower(s)Nature Fresh/Fresh Farms
    Contact: Mike Pasquinelli
    Address: 5635 E Gila Ridge Rd.
    Yuma Arizona 85366
    United States
    Phone Number: 928 726 97 22 Fax Number: 928 726 61 09
    Email(s):mikep@naturefreshfarms.net; lupe@naturefreshfarms.net
Ranch(s)Ash 179 (Organic Ranch)
    Holtville California
    United States
Facility(s)Taylor Farms - Hansen
    Contact:Joshua Tamayo
    Address: 1275 Hansen Street, Salinas CA 93901
    Salinas California 93901
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-676-9582 Fax Number: 831-676-9502
    Email(s):jtamayo@taylorfarms.com
Audit Type:Farm/Ranch
Foreman or Contact Person (and email):Mike Pasquinelli
Location/City:Holtville
State:California
Country:United States
Date Audit Started:10/30/2009 08:00
Date Audit Finished:10/30/2009 15:00
Commodity(ies):Spring Mix, Spinach
Auditor:Mario Gutierrez (PrimusLabs Auditors)
Audit Percentage Score:99%
Announced Audit?Yes
Audit Scope:Review of Good Agricultural Practices in a farming operation.
Audit Entered By:Mario Gutierrez


Self Inspection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
01.01Have Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) manuals covering each growing area within the scope of this audit (e.g., growing operation, orchard, vineyard) been developed and are they available for review?Yes55Yes, there is a written document with their Food Safety Program, that include Standard Operative Procedures (SOP's), Risk Assessments, Water Management Plan, Ranch Maps, Rodent Control Program, Amphibian Field Inspections logs, Plastic Netting Program.
01.02Have documented Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)self-audits been completed for each growing area that is within the scope of this audit (e.g. growing operation, orchard, vineyard)?Yes77Yes, conducted by Mike Pasquinelli. Records are kept on Pre-planting Food Safety inspections for all ranches, including water sources, equipment yard, facilities and shops. Corrective actions noted on each inspection are kept on file with monitoring logs.

Traceability
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
02.01Is the growing area(s) adequately identified or coded to enable trace back and trace forward in the event of a recall?Yes1515Yes. Traceback program in written with emergency contact numbers and procedures. Ranch maps with name of ranch, block numbers, acreage, water distribution, takeouts, and restroom locations, commodity planting schedule, also available.

Ground History
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
03.01Were farming area(s) used for growing food crops for human consumption last season?Yes00Yes. The farming area was used for the production of crops for human consumption, as seen on crop history records. Land history affidavit are kept on file.
03.02Has the growing area(s) been used for any non-agricultural functions? If No, go to 3.03No77No. Refer to 3.01.
03.02aIf the land had been used previously for non-agricultural functions have soil tests been conducted showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00
03.03Has the growing area(s) been used for animal husbandry or grazing land for animals? If No, go to 3.04No77No. The growing area has not been used for animal husbandry or grazing animals. Refer to 3.01.
03.03aIf the land was used previously for animal husbandry or grazing land for livestock, has a risk evaluation been performed?N/A00
03.04Is there any evidence of animal activity in the crop that is a potential food safety risk?No2020No. no evidence of animal activity in crops were seen during the time of the audit.
03.05Has flooding from uncontrolled causes occurred on the growing area(s) since the previous growing season? If No, go to 3.06No00No. No flooding has been occurred in this valley in the previous growing season.
03.05aIf the growing area(s) and product was affected from the flood waters, is there documented evidence that corrective measures were taken to affected land and product?N/A00
03.05bHave soil tests been conducted on the flooded area(s) showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00
03.06Is the growing operation under organic principles? If No , go to 3.07Yes00Yes. This growing area is handled under organic principles.
03.06aIs current certification by an accredited organic certification organization on file and available for review?Yes00Yes. ASCO certified.
03.07If the growing area(s) is a new purchase or lease, has a documented risk assessment been undertaken?N/A00N/A. No new land open to grow produce in this ranch.

Adjacent Land Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
04.01Is the adjacent land to the growing area a possible source of contamination from intensive livestock production (e.g. feed lots, dairy operations, poultry houses, meat rendering operation)? If No, go to 4.02No1010No. No intensive livestock production close to this field.
04.01aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate this possible contamination source onto the growing area (e.g. buffer areas, physical barriers, fences, ditches, etc.)?N/A00
04.02Are, or is there evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) in proximity to growing operation? If No, go to 4.03No1010No. No evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands in proximity to this growing operation. However this is an open area and grower have measures to mitigate or restrain animal (domestic and/or wild) entrance to this field (rodent control program, amphibian control, bird control program, plastic netting, all as needed, and monitoring records of visual inspections). Houses noted across Barbara Worth Rd.
04.02aHave physical measures been put in place to restrain domestic animals, grazing lands, (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) and their waste from entering the growing area (e.g. vegetative strips, wind breaks, physical barriers, berms, fences, diversion ditches.)?N/A00
04.02bIs there a written policy supported by visual evidence that domestic, livestock, or wild animals are not allowed in the growing area? Note: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.N/A00
04.02cAre measures in place to reduce or limit the animal intrusion (i.e., monitoring field perimeter for signs of intrusion)?N/A00
04.03Are untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land? If No, go to 4.04No1010No. No untreated manure piles, compost, bio-solids, or non-synthetic amendments are stored close to this field.
04.03aHave physical measures been taken to secure untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land?N/A00
04.03bIf biosolids are stored and/or applied on adjacent land, has the adjacent landowner supplied paperwork confirming the biosolids meet prevailing guidelines, governmental, or local standards?N/A00
04.04Is the growing area situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations or functions (e.g. leach fields,  runoff or potential flooding from sewers, toilet systems, industrial facilities, labor camps)? If No, go to 4.05No1010No. The growing operation is not situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations.
04.04aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate risks related to nearby operations?N/A00
04.05Is there a documented and implemented policy that infant or toddler aged children are not allowed in the growing area? NOTE: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.Yes1010Yes, there is a policy in place. Training outlines have included this policy and visitors policy, also.

Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
05.01Is untreated human sewage sludge used in the growing cycle? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020No. Untreated human sewage sludge is not used in the growing operation.
05.02Is compost produced from animal derived materials used by the grower? If No, go to 5.03Yes00This question is specifically targeting compost produced from raw animal manures, as opposed to green waste.Yes. Compost used in this certified organic farming operation.
05.02aAre compost applications incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?Yes1010Yes, records are kept on file with spreading date.
05.02bAre there compost use records available for each growing area, including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?Yes1515Yes, application records are kept on file.
05.02cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (CoA) from the compost supplier(s) that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing) and does the grower have relevant letters of guarantee regarding SOP's and logs?Yes2020Yes, all this relevant information was required from their supplier (Bull Enterprises) and all are kept on file.
05.03Are biosolids used? If No, go to 5.04. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Greens) which ban the use of biosolids, see 5.03dNo00No. Bio-solids are not used in this farming operation.
05.03aAre biosolids incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00
05.03bAre the grower's biosolids use records available for each growing area, especially application records?N/A00
05.03cAre there a Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) from the biosolid supplier(s) certifying compliance with prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00
05.03dAre biosolids being applied to crops where the country of production regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials e.g. Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines in California? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00
05.04Is untreated animal manure used? If No, go to 5.05. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines) which ban the use of untreated animal manures. See 5.04dNo1515No. Untreated animal manure is not used in this farming operation.
05.04aIs untreated animal manure incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00
05.04bAre there untreated animal manure records available for each growing area including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 120 days (unless more stringent laws or guidelines exist)?N/A00
05.04cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), specification or some other document available for review provided by the untreated animal manure supplier stating the components of the material?N/A00
05.04dAre untreated animal manures being applied to crops where the country regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines)? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00
05.05Are other nonsynthetic crop treatments used (e.g. compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal,"bio fertilizers")? If No, go to 5.06Yes00Examples include but are not limited to compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal, and "bio fertilizers" that are produced from animal materials.Yes. Agrolizer and chicken manure pellets are used in this certified organic operation.
05.05aAre nonsynthetic treatments that contain animal products or animal manures applied to the edible portions crops?No1515No. All are applied pre-planting or through irrigation system.
05.05bAre nonsynthetic crop treatment records available for each growing area including application records demonstrating the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?Yes1515Yes, as seen on application records.
05.05cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis available from the nonsynthetic crop treatment suppliers that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing)?Yes2020Yes, all relevant information is required from their supplier (True Organic Products) and are kept on file.
05.06Are any soil amendments (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers) used that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures? If No, go to 5.07No00No. Soil amendments are not used in this farming operation.
05.06aAre the grower's soil amendment (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures) records available for review including application records?N/A00
05.06bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) and/or letters of guarantee stating that the materials used are free from animal products and/or animal manures?N/A00
05.07Are inorganic fertilizers used? If No, go to 5.08Yes00Yes. inorganic fertilizers are used in this farming operation.
05.07aAre the grower's inorganic fertilizer records available for review including application records?Yes1010Yes, records are kept for each application.
05.07bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), letters of guarantee or some other documents from the inorganic fertilizer supplier(s) that specifies the source of all the ingredients including inert materials?Yes77Yes. Letters from suppliers, COA's, are kept on file. CPS, Fertizona, Dune Co., Sunland Chemical, Helena Chemical, Soilserve,
05.08If fertilizers and/or fertilizer containers are stored on the property, are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination to the growing area(s) or any of water sources?N/A00N/A. Not stored in this field. When application occurs, suppliers have nurse tanks for fertigation or applications through furrow irrigation.

Irrigation/Water Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
06.01Does the growing operation practice dryland farming? If No, go to 6.02.No00This refers to crop production that relies only on direct rainfall.No. Irrigated cropping system.
06.01aIf the growing operation practices dryland farming, are there water systems used in the growing operation to supply for crop needs such as crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02N/A00
06.01bAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.01d.N/A00
06.01cAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.01dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols which include how samples should be identified?N/A00
06.01eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.01fIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.02Is the water used for the growing operation sourced from Municipal or District water pipeline systems? If No, go to 6.03No00(No recommendation)No. Municipal or District pipelines are not used for irrigation in this farming operation.
06.02aAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02c.N/A00
06.02bAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.02cDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.02dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.02eIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.02fAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.02gIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.02hAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00
06.02iAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.03Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from wells? If No, go to 6.04No00(No recommendation)No. Wells are not used for irrigation purposes in this farming operation.
06.03aAre all well heads an adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00
06.03bIs the well designed to prevent contamination?N/A00
06.03cIs it evident that the well(s) is free from contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of wells?N/A00
06.03dAre records kept for periodic inspections and treatment of wells (if performed) available for review?N/A00
06.03eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.03gN/A00
06.03fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.03gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.03hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.03iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.03jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.03kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.03lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00
06.03mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.04Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from ponds, reservoirs, watersheds or other surface water source? If No, go to 6.05No00No. Ponds, reservoirs, watersheds are not used for irrigation purposes in this farming operation.
06.04aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00
06.04bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?N/A00
06.04cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?N/A00
06.04dAre records kept for the periodic visual inspections and disinfection treatments (if used) available for review?N/A00
06.04eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.04gN/A00
06.04fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.04gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.04hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.04iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.04jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.04kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.04lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00
06.04mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.05Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from canals, rivers, ditches, or other open flowing water systems? If No, go to 6.06Yes00Water sourced from canals, rivers, ditches or other open flowing water systems may carry more of a risk for contamination than closed water sources. For surface waters, consider the impact of storm events on irrigation practices. Bacterial loads in surface water are generally much higher than normal, and caution should be exercised when using these waters for irrigation.Yes. Irrigation water used in this farming operation is sourced from canals.
06.05aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?Yes1515Yes. Untreated manure not observed close to canals or ditches in this farming operation.
06.05bIs the water source under the direction of a water authority or district?Yes55Yes, there is a District Water authority who handles the distribution of the canal water to all growers.
06.05cDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?Yes07Animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) should not have access to the system due to the possibility of contamination occurrences.Yes, since this is an open area source, however, domestic, livestock or wild animals or evidence of them were not seen during the time of the audit close or inside canals or ditches.
06.05dIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?Yes1010Yes. Weeds, trash, garbage or other source of possible contamination not observed during the time of the audit. Rodent control, air guns, monitoring logs (visual inspections), maintenance of canals and ditches program, and bird control are some of the mitigation measures implemented by this grower to minimize the risk of contamination.
06.05eAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?Yes77Yes. Records are kept on file. Refer to 6.05d.
06.05fAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.05hYes2020Yes. Test are conducted on a monthly basis. Grower requires from all their suppliers tests conducted on their water sources for mixing of chemicals.
06.05gAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?Yes1515Yes. According to their food safety program and according to LGMA metrics.
06.05hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?Yes1010Yes. Procedures are developed in a SOP.
06.05iDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?Yes1010Yes. Developed in their GAP manual.
06.05jIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.05kAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?No00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.
06.05lIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.Yes00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.
06.05mAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?Yes00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.
06.05nAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?No00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.
06.06Is reclaimed water used in the growing operation? NOTE: This refers to wastewater that has gone through a treatment process. If No, go to 6.07.No00No. Reclaimed water is not used in this growing operation.
06.06aIs the reclamation process under the direction of a water reclamation management or authority?N/A00
06.06bAre microbial control measures for reclaimed water utilized?N/A00
06.06cAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.06eN/A00
06.06dAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.06eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.06fDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.06gIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.06hAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.06iIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.06jAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00
06.06kAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.07Are tail water (run off water) systems used in the growing operation? If No, go to 6.08.No00No. tail water is not used in this farming operation.
06.07aIs tail water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00
06.07bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the tail water systems?N/A00
06.07cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the tail water system?N/A00
06.07dAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?N/A00
06.07eAre microbial tests conducted, including Generic E.coli on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.07gN/A00
06.07fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.07gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.07hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.07iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.07jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.07kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.07lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?N/A00
06.07mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.08Are check valves, anti-siphon devices, or other back flow prevention systems in use when and where necessary?N/A00
06.09Is irrigation equipment not in use free from pest contamination and stored clean off the ground?Yes1010Yes all are kept off ground.

Crop Protection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
07.01Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials?Yes55Yes. There is a developed SOP that includes: Objectives, concern, procedures, mixing and loading procedures, applications procedures and cleaning procedures. This is a certified organic operation, however, grower uses same policies for the mixing and loading handling.
07.01aIs mixing, loading, or the dilution of crop protection materials performed safely and within a distance where the growing area and water sources are not affected?N/A00N/A. This activity not observed during the time of the audit.
07.02Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment?Yes55Yes. There is a developed SOP that includes: Objectives, concern, procedures, mixing and loading procedures, applications procedures and cleaning procedures. This is a certified organic operation, however, grower uses same policies for the rinsing and cleaning handling.
07.02aIs rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment performed safely and within a distance where land and water sources are not affected?N/A00N/A. This activity not observed during the time of the audit.
07.03Is there documentation that shows the individual(s) making decisions for crop protection are qualified?Yes1010Yes. Copy of licenses are on file.
07.04Is there documentation that shows employees who handle crop protection materials are trained or are under the supervision of a trained individual?Yes1515Yes. All applications are conducted by licensed private applicators. In-house employees handling crop protection materials are trained and licensed, as seen on records of trainings (conducted by the chemical companies), and usually they handles non restricted materials like round up or other used for weed control.
07.05Does the growing operation follow a pesticide application recording program? If No, go to 7.06 If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. All crop protection products applied to this growing operation are recorded and records are kept on file as need following the National/State and County regulations.
07.05aAre crop protection application records up to date and available for review?Yes1515Yes. Dated records and pesticide application histories are available to review.
07.06Are crop protection materials registered in the country of use for the target crop where official registration is in place? If this question is answered Yes, skip to question 7.07. If no official registration system is utilized answer this question N/A and go to 7.06a. Where a system exists, but a crop protection chemical being used is not registered for the target crop either "in country" or by extrapolation (see 7.06a), the response to this question is No. If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. EPA registration numbers are recorded on log forms, since the PCA recommendation through the notice of application (10-80 form).
07.06aDoes the country of production allow the use of crop protection materials that are registered for the target crop in another country, as long as the use of this material does not contravene any prevailing national and local laws in the destination country (e.g. maximum residue limit, banned lists, etc.)? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00
07.07Are crop protection applications restricted by the guidelines established by the product label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. Current crop protection products records shows recommendations from PCA and application records to follow.
07.08Where harvesting is restricted by pre-harvest intervals (as required on the crop protection chemical product labels, manufacturer recommendations and/or by prevailing national/ local standards) is the grower adhering to these pre-harvest interval time periods? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. All recommendations from PCA have posted the PHI and notice of applications, also. Grower notice to all supervisors and foreman from all PPP applications.
07.09Are employee re-entry intervals established as required by the pesticide label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?Yes1010Yes. Recorded at recommendations and 10-80's. All key personal receive advise.
07.10When crop protection applications occur, does posting take place on area of treatment according to prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?Yes1010Yes. Field posting and removal done by licensed pest control operators.
07.11To avoid drift, are crop protection applications restricted when gusts are excessive?N/A00N/A. Not seen during the time of the audit. However there is a SOP developed for applications of plant protection products.
07.12If crop protection containers are stored on the property (even temporarily), are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination and disposed of responsibly?N/A00N/A. Storage not available at this field.
07.13Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)?Yes1010Yes. There is a developed SOP that includes: Objectives, concern, procedures, mixing and loading procedures, applications procedures and cleaning procedures.
07.13aIs it evident that the equipment used for crop protection applications is in good working order?N/A00N/A. Equipment not available at this field.

Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
08.01Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy for dealing with employees who appear to be physically ill, or become ill while working?Yes1010Yes. This farming operation have a documented and implemented policy (Employee awareness for health and hygiene).
08.02Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy regarding employees with open sores and wounds?Yes1010Yes. This farming operation have a documented and implemented policy (Employee awareness for health and hygiene).
08.03Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented procedure in place requiring for all commodities that come in contact with blood to be destroyed? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes, called Bleeding incidents and Blood policy.
08.04Does the growing operation have documented and implemented policies prohibiting eating, drinking (including gum chewing) using tobacco in the growing area?Yes1010Yes. This farming operation have a documented and implemented policy (Employee awareness for health and hygiene).
08.05Is there a food safety hygiene training program covering new and existing employees and are there records of these training events?Yes1515Yes. This farming operation have a documented and implemented policy (Employee Training Program).
08.06Are there operational toilet facilities provided? If NO, go to 8.07. If this question is answered No, the audit will result in an automatic failure.Yes2020Yes, toilets are placed in this growing operation.
08.06aAre the toilet facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010Yes. Toilets are placed at strategic areas for easy acces to all employees. Map location available.
08.06bAre toilet facilities in a suitable location to prevent contamination to the growing area?Yes1515Yes. all are placed away from growing area, equipment and implements, and water sources.
08.06cIs a minimum of one toilet facility provided for each group of 20 employees?N/A00N/A. There is a single cabin placed at this field, however, is not usual to have more than 20 employees at a time in this farming operation. When occurs (thinning and weeding crews), they carry their own toilet facilities.
08.06dDo toilet facilities have visuals or signs, written in the appropriate languages, reminding employees to wash their hands before returning to work?Yes22Yes, visual signs posted on toilet cabin.
08.06eAre the toilets maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and are there records showing toilet cleaning, servicing and stocking is occurring regularly?Yes1010Yes, toilet appears very clean.
08.06fAre the catch basins of the toilets designed and maintained to prevent contamination in the field (e.g. free from leaks and cracks)?Yes55Yes, no leaks or cracks noted during the time of the audit.
08.06gIs there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination?Yes55Yes, developed in their GAP manual. Outside labor contractors are required to follow food safety rules and to provide their own GAP manuals.
08.07Is there evidence of fecal contamination in proximity to the growing area or any storage areas? (This refer to a single account of human or domestic animal fecal matter and/or systematic discoveries of wild animal manure) If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020No. Not a single issue noted during the time of the audit in the proximity of this growing area.
08.08Are there operational hand washing facilities provided? If No, go to 8.09Yes1515Yes. Hand washing station placed at the toilet cabin.
08.08aAre the hand washing facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010Yes.
08.08bAre hand wash stations clearly visible (e.g. situated outside the toilet facility) and easily accessible to workers?No00So employee's hand washing activities can be verified, hand wash stations should be clearly visible (i.e. situated outside the toilet facility) and easily accessible to workers.No. Hand washing station placed inside toilet cabin.
08.08cAre hand wash stations properly stocked with soap, paper towels and trash can?Yes55Yes. Soap, paper towels and trash cans available.
08.08dAre the hand wash stations designed and being maintained to prevent contamination onto the growing area ( i.e. spent water does not go straight to the ground)?Yes55Yes. All water captured in their deposits.
08.08eDoes the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy and procedure in place requiring employees to wash their hands (e.g. prior to beginning work, after breaks, after toilet use)?Yes1010Yes. This farming operation have a documented and implemented policy (Employee awareness for health and hygiene).
08.09Is fresh potable drinking water provided for workers? If No, go to 8.10Yes1010Yes.
08.09aIf used, are water containers maintained in a clean condition?Yes55Yes.
08.10Are first-aid kits available and is the inventory maintained properly?Yes55Yes, at supervisors and foremen trucks.
08.11Are there trash cans available on the farm placed in suitable locations?Yes55Yes.
08.12Are there any foreign material issues observed that are or could be potential risks to the product in the growing area (e.g jewelry)?No55

Food Security
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
09.01Are measures taken to control vehicle access to the growing area? (specified access roads, furrows, etc)?Yes55Yes. The growing area have specific roads to transit through them to facilitate farming and harvesting operations.
09.02Are postings such as "No Trespassing" and/or " Restricted Entry" used appropriately?Yes55Yes, placed at the entrances of this field.
09.03Are entrances to ranch-level roads restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdfNo. Not available.
09.04Are wells or other water sources secured and designed to prohibit tampering?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdfNo. since this is an open water source.
09.05Are grounds and facilities monitored by either in house or contracted personnel?Yes55Yes. Monitoring logs are kept on file.
09.06Are staff members instructed to note and report suspicious activity?Yes55Yes, as a part of their training program.
09.07Are high risk areas (e.g. spray equipment, equipment shops, sheds) monitored?Yes55
09.08Is equipment examined for tampering prior to use?Yes55
09.09Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records?Yes55
09.10Is education material related to security made available?Yes55
09.11Are inventory records of agricultural chemicals maintained? If No, go to 9.12N/A00
09.11aAre the inventory records periodically reconciled with inventory?N/A00
09.12Are all personal materials kept away from the harvest and packaging of  the harvesting operation?N/A00


Audit Scoring Summary
Self InspectionScore12
Possible Points12
Percent Score100%
TraceabilityScore15
Possible Points15
Percent Score100%
Ground HistoryScore34
Possible Points34
Percent Score100%
Adjacent Land UseScore50
Possible Points50
Percent Score100%
Fertilizer/Crop NutritionScore147
Possible Points147
Percent Score100%
Irrigation/Water UseScore102
Possible Points109
Percent Score94%
Crop ProtectionScore160
Possible Points160
Percent Score100%
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)Score227
Possible Points227
Percent Score100%
TotalScore747
Possible Points754
Percent Score99%