* Powered By Google

Version 1.0 Jan 14, 2009

PrimusLabs Audit (94962)
Ranch v07.04
Grower(s)Duncan Family Farms
    Contact:Jeremy Vanderzyl
    Address: 18969 W. McDowell Road
    Buckeye Arizona 85396
    United States
    Phone Number: (623) 853-9880
    Email(s):Jeremy@duncanfamilyfarms.net
Ranch(s)35
    Address: 17203 W. Indian School Rd.
    Goodyear Arizona 85395
    United States
Facility(s)Taylor Farms - Hansen
    Contact:Joshua Tamayo
    Address: 1275 Hansen Street, Salinas CA 93901
    Salinas California 93901
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-676-9582 Fax Number: 831-676-9502
    Email(s):jtamayo@taylorfarms.com
Audit Type:Farm/Ranch
Foreman or Contact Person (and email):Pete Guerrero (pete@duncanfamilyfarms.net)
Location/City:Goodyear
State:Arizona
Country:United States
Date Audit Started:01/13/2009 08:00
Date Audit Finished:01/13/2009 13:30
Commodity(ies):Spring Mix, Spinach
Auditor:Isaac Santos (PrimusLabs Auditors)
Audit Percentage Score:96%
Announced Audit?No
Audit Scope:Visual inspection of the growing area, adjacent lands, water sources, storage areas, ranch accesses, review of ground history, GAP manuals and food safety documents.
Audit Entered By:Isaac Santos.
Other Auditing Personnel And Role:N/A.
GPS Coordinates:Latitude:Length:
33° 27' 53"112° 25' 38"
33° 27' 53"112° 26' 38"
33° 28' 45"112° 26' 38"
33° 28' 45"112° 25' 38"


Self Inspection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
01.01Have Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) manuals covering each growing area within the scope of this audit (e.g., growing operation, orchard, vineyard) been developed and are they available for review?Yes55Yes. Complete GAP manual was available for review.
01.02Have documented Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)self-audits been completed for each growing area that is within the scope of this audit (e.g. growing operation, orchard, vineyard)?Yes77Yes. A self audit was available.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Traceability
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
02.01Is the growing area(s) adequately identified or coded to enable trace back and trace forward in the event of a recall?Yes1515Yes. Ranch maps with blocks identification have been developed by the grower.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Ground History
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
03.01Were farming area(s) used for growing food crops for human consumption last season?Yes00Yes. The farming area was used for growing food crops for human consumption last season.
03.02Has the growing area(s) been used for any non-agricultural functions? If No, go to 3.03No77No. The growing area has not been used for any non-agricultural functions.
03.02aIf the land had been used previously for non-agricultural functions have soil tests been conducted showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 03.02
03.03Has the growing area(s) been used for animal husbandry or grazing land for animals? If No, go to 3.04No77No. The growing area has not been used for animal husbandry or grazing land for animals.
03.03aIf the land was used previously for animal husbandry or grazing land for livestock, has a risk evaluation been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 03.03
03.04Is there any evidence of animal activity in the crop that is a potential food safety risk?No2020No. There was not any evidence of animal activity in the crop.
03.05Has flooding from uncontrolled causes occurred on the growing area(s) since the previous growing season? If No, go to 3.06No00No. The growing area has not been flooded.
03.05aIf the growing area(s) and product was affected from the flood waters, is there documented evidence that corrective measures were taken to affected land and product?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 03.05
03.05bHave soil tests been conducted on the flooded area(s) showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 03.05
03.06Is the growing operation under organic principles? If No , go to 3.07Yes00Yes. This ranch is grown under organic principles.
03.06aIs current certification by an accredited organic certification organization on file and available for review?Yes00Yes. There was an organic certification, issued by Q.A.I.
03.07If the growing area(s) is a new purchase or lease, has a documented risk assessment been undertaken?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. This is not a new purchase or lease.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Adjacent Land Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
04.01Is the adjacent land to the growing area a possible source of contamination from intensive livestock production (e.g. feed lots, dairy operations, poultry houses, meat rendering operation)? If No, go to 4.02No1010No. The adjacent land to the growing area is not a possible source of contamination from intensive livestock production.
04.01aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate this possible contamination source onto the growing area (e.g. buffer areas, physical barriers, fences, ditches, etc.)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 04.01
04.02Are, or is there evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) in proximity to growing operation? If No, go to 4.03No1010No. There was no evidence of animals, grazing lands, homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock in proximity to growing operation.
04.02aHave physical measures been put in place to restrain domestic animals, grazing lands, (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) and their waste from entering the growing area (e.g. vegetative strips, wind breaks, physical barriers, berms, fences, diversion ditches.)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 04.02
04.02bIs there a written policy supported by visual evidence that domestic, livestock, or wild animals are not allowed in the growing area? Note: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 04.02
04.02cAre measures in place to reduce or limit the animal intrusion (i.e., monitoring field perimeter for signs of intrusion)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 04.02
04.03Are untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land? If No, go to 4.04Yes010Adjacent refers to all parcels of land next to the growing operation or within a distance where the crop in question may be affected by untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land.Yes. There were compost piles observed in a segregated/designated area in the ranch.
04.03aHave physical measures been taken to secure untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land?Yes1515Yes. An approximate 500' buffer zone is kept between the growing area and the compost material. No fences or other physical barriers observed.
04.03bIf biosolids are stored and/or applied on adjacent land, has the adjacent landowner supplied paperwork confirming the biosolids meet prevailing guidelines, governmental, or local standards?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Biosolids are not stored and/or applied on adjacent land.
04.04Is the growing area situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations or functions (e.g. leach fields,  runoff or potential flooding from sewers, toilet systems, industrial facilities, labor camps)? If No, go to 4.05No1010No. The growing area is not situated in a higher risk location.
04.04aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate risks related to nearby operations?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 04.04
04.05Is there a documented and implemented policy that infant or toddler aged children are not allowed in the growing area? NOTE: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.Yes1010Yes. Policy that infant or toddler age children are not allowed in the growing area is kept on file.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
05.01Is untreated human sewage sludge used in the growing cycle? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020No. Untreated human sewage sludge has not been used at this farm.
05.02Is compost produced from animal derived materials used by the grower? If No, go to 5.03Yes00This question is specifically targeting compost produced from raw animal manures, as opposed to green waste.Yes. Compost made from animal derived materials, was used in this ranch.
05.02aAre compost applications incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?Yes1010Yes. Compost applications are incorporated into the soil prior to planting.
05.02bAre there compost use records available for each growing area, including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?Yes1515Yes.
05.02cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (CoA) from the compost supplier(s) that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing) and does the grower have relevant letters of guarantee regarding SOP's and logs?Yes2020Yes. Microbiological tests were conducted on 11/16 and 11/28, 2008, by BSK for EHEC, E. Coli O157:H7, Salmonella and E.C.
05.03Are biosolids used? If No, go to 5.04. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Greens) which ban the use of biosolids, see 5.03dNo00No. Biosolids have not been used at this farm.
05.03aAre biosolids incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.03
05.03bAre the grower's biosolids use records available for each growing area, especially application records?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.03
05.03cAre there a Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) from the biosolid supplier(s) certifying compliance with prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.03
05.03dAre biosolids being applied to crops where the country of production regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials e.g. Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines in California? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.03
05.04Is untreated animal manure used? If No, go to 5.05. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines) which ban the use of untreated animal manures. See 5.04dNo1515No. Untreated animal manure was not used at this farm.
05.04aIs untreated animal manure incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.04
05.04bAre there untreated animal manure records available for each growing area including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 120 days (unless more stringent laws or guidelines exist)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.04
05.04cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), specification or some other document available for review provided by the untreated animal manure supplier stating the components of the material?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.04
05.04dAre untreated animal manures being applied to crops where the country regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines)? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.04
05.05Are other nonsynthetic crop treatments used (e.g. compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal,"bio fertilizers")? If No, go to 5.06Yes00Examples include but are not limited to compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal, and "bio fertilizers" that are produced from animal materials.Yes. Nonsynthetic crop treatments were used at this ranch.
05.05aAre nonsynthetic treatments that contain animal products or animal manures applied to the edible portions crops?Yes015Nonsynthetic treatments that contain animal products or animal manures should not be applied to the edible portions of crops.Yes. Fish emulsion was applied on edible portions of the crop.
05.05bAre nonsynthetic crop treatment records available for each growing area including application records demonstrating the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?Yes1515Yes.
05.05cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis available from the nonsynthetic crop treatment suppliers that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing)?Yes2020Yes. There was a CoA conducted by FSNS available for review.
05.06Are any soil amendments (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers) used that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures? If No, go to 5.07No00No. Soil amendments were not used.
05.06aAre the grower's soil amendment (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures) records available for review including application records?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.06
05.06bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) and/or letters of guarantee stating that the materials used are free from animal products and/or animal manures?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.06
05.07Are inorganic fertilizers used? If No, go to 5.08No00Examples of manufactured inorganic fertilizers include ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, chemically synthesized urea, etc.No. Synthetic fertilizers were not used at this ranch.
05.07aAre the grower's inorganic fertilizer records available for review including application records?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.07
05.07bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), letters of guarantee or some other documents from the inorganic fertilizer supplier(s) that specifies the source of all the ingredients including inert materials?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 05.07
05.08If fertilizers and/or fertilizer containers are stored on the property, are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination to the growing area(s) or any of water sources?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Fertilizer containers were not stored on the property.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Irrigation/Water Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
06.01Does the growing operation practice dryland farming? If No, go to 6.02.No00This refers to crop production that relies only on direct rainfall.No. This is an irrigated farming.
06.01aIf the growing operation practices dryland farming, are there water systems used in the growing operation to supply for crop needs such as crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.01
06.01bAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.01d.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.01
06.01cAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.01
06.01dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols which include how samples should be identified?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.01
06.01eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.01
06.01fIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.01
06.02Is the water used for the growing operation sourced from Municipal or District water pipeline systems? If No, go to 6.03No00(No recommendation)No. The water used for the growing operation is not sourced from Municipal or District water pipeline systems.
06.02aAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02c.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02bAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02cDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02eIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02fAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02gIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02hAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.02iAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.02
06.03Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from wells? If No, go to 6.04Yes00Yes. The water used in the growing operation is sourced from wells.
06.03aAre all well heads an adequate distance from untreated manure?Yes1515Yes. Untreated manure was not present on the well surrounding areas and/or adjacent lands and/or growing areas.
06.03bIs the well designed to prevent contamination?Yes1010Yes.
06.03cIs it evident that the well(s) is free from contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of wells?Yes1010Yes.
06.03dAre records kept for periodic inspections and treatment of wells (if performed) available for review?Yes77Yes. Records of well inspections, conducted on a weekly basis, were available for review.
06.03eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.03gYes2020Yes.
06.03fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?Yes1515Yes. The microbiological tests are conducted on a monthly basis by FSNS.
06.03gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?Yes1010Yes.
06.03hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?Yes1010Yes.
06.03iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Abnormal results have not been detected.
06.03jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?No00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.No. The crops are not irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system.
06.03kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.Yes00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.Yes. The crops are irrigated by sprinklers.
06.03lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?No00No. The crops are not irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system.
06.03mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?No00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.No. The crops are not sub irrigated.
06.04Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from ponds, reservoirs, watersheds or other surface water source? If No, go to 6.05No00No. Water from reservoirs is not used at this ranch.
06.04aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04dAre records kept for the periodic visual inspections and disinfection treatments (if used) available for review?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.04gN/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.04mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.04
06.05Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from canals, rivers, ditches, or other open flowing water systems? If No, go to 6.06Yes00Water sourced from canals, rivers, ditches or other open flowing water systems may carry more of a risk for contamination than closed water sources. For surface waters, consider the impact of storm events on irrigation practices. Bacterial loads in surface water are generally much higher than normal, and caution should be exercised when using these waters for irrigation.Yes. Water used in the growing operation is sourced from canals.
06.05aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?Yes1515Yes.
06.05bIs the water source under the direction of a water authority or district?Yes55Yes. Water source is under the direction of Maricopa Water District (MWD).
06.05cDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?Yes07Animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) should not have access to the system due to the possibility of contamination occurrences.Yes.
06.05dIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?Yes1010Yes. No issues seen.
06.05eAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?Yes77Yes. Inspection records for periodic visual inspection of the water source, are dated on a weekly basis.
06.05fAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.05hYes2020Yes. Microbial tests are conducted by Food Safety Net Services (FSNS).
06.05gAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?Yes1515Yes.
06.05hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?Yes1010Yes.
06.05iDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?Yes1010Yes.
06.05jIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Abnormal results have not been detected.
06.05kAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?No00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.No. The crops are not irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system.
06.05lIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.Yes00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.Yes. The crops are irrigated by a sprinkler system.
06.05mAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?No00No. The crops are not irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system.
06.05nAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?No00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.No. The crops are not sub irrigated.
06.06Is reclaimed water used in the growing operation? NOTE: This refers to wastewater that has gone through a treatment process. If No, go to 6.07.No00No. Reclaimed water is not used in the growing operation.
06.06aIs the reclamation process under the direction of a water reclamation management or authority?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06bAre microbial control measures for reclaimed water utilized?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06cAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.06eN/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06dAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06fDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06gIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06hAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06iIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06jAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.06kAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.06
06.07Are tail water (run off water) systems used in the growing operation? If No, go to 6.08.No00No. Tail water (run off water) systems are not used in the growing operation.
06.07aIs tail water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the tail water systems?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the tail water system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07dAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07eAre microbial tests conducted, including Generic E.coli on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.07gN/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.07mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 06.07
06.08Are check valves, anti-siphon devices, or other back flow prevention systems in use when and where necessary?Yes1010Yes. Check valves are used to avoid water back flow.
06.09Is irrigation equipment not in use free from pest contamination and stored clean off the ground?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Unused irrigation equipment was not observed during the audit.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Crop Protection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
07.01Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials?Yes55Yes.
07.01aIs mixing, loading, or the dilution of crop protection materials performed safely and within a distance where the growing area and water sources are not affected?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Crop protection applications were not observed.
07.02Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment?Yes55Yes. The written procedure for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment, was kept on file.
07.02aIs rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment performed safely and within a distance where land and water sources are not affected?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Crop protection applications were not observed.
07.03Is there documentation that shows the individual(s) making decisions for crop protection are qualified?Yes1010Yes. PCA Alicia Etchart, license 09-3231 is the person responsible for making decisions of crop protection products applications recommendations.
07.04Is there documentation that shows employees who handle crop protection materials are trained or are under the supervision of a trained individual?Yes1515Yes. There was a letter issued by their pesticide applicator contractor company, detailing that employees who handle crop protection materials are trained by them.
07.05Does the growing operation follow a pesticide application recording program? If No, go to 7.06 If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. All crop protection products applications are recorded.
07.05aAre crop protection application records up to date and available for review?Yes1515Yes.
07.06Are crop protection materials registered in the country of use for the target crop where official registration is in place? If this question is answered Yes, skip to question 7.07. If no official registration system is utilized answer this question N/A and go to 7.06a. Where a system exists, but a crop protection chemical being used is not registered for the target crop either "in country" or by extrapolation (see 7.06a), the response to this question is No. If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. All materials used are registered in the country of use for the target crop.
07.06aDoes the country of production allow the use of crop protection materials that are registered for the target crop in another country, as long as the use of this material does not contravene any prevailing national and local laws in the destination country (e.g. maximum residue limit, banned lists, etc.)? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 07.06
07.07Are crop protection applications restricted by the guidelines established by the product label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes.
07.08Where harvesting is restricted by pre-harvest intervals (as required on the crop protection chemical product labels, manufacturer recommendations and/or by prevailing national/ local standards) is the grower adhering to these pre-harvest interval time periods? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes.
07.09Are employee re-entry intervals established as required by the pesticide label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?Yes1010Yes.
07.10When crop protection applications occur, does posting take place on area of treatment according to prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Crop protection applications were not observed.
07.11To avoid drift, are crop protection applications restricted when gusts are excessive?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Crop protection applications were not observed.
07.12If crop protection containers are stored on the property (even temporarily), are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination and disposed of responsibly?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Crop protection containers were not stored on the property.
07.13Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)?Yes1010Yes.
07.13aIs it evident that the equipment used for crop protection applications is in good working order?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Crop protection applications were not observed.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
08.01Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy for dealing with employees who appear to be physically ill, or become ill while working?Yes1010Yes. Policy kept on file.
08.02Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy regarding employees with open sores and wounds?Yes1010Yes. Policy kept on file.
08.03Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented procedure in place requiring for all commodities that come in contact with blood to be destroyed? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes.
08.04Does the growing operation have documented and implemented policies prohibiting eating, drinking (including gum chewing) using tobacco in the growing area?Yes1010Yes.
08.05Is there a food safety hygiene training program covering new and existing employees and are there records of these training events?Yes1515Yes. Records for hygiene training covering new and existing employees were available for review.
08.06Are there operational toilet facilities provided? If NO, go to 8.07. If this question is answered No, the audit will result in an automatic failure.Yes2020Yes. Toilet facilities are provided.
08.06aAre the toilet facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010Yes.
08.06bAre toilet facilities in a suitable location to prevent contamination to the growing area?Yes1515Yes. Toilet facilities are situated out of the growing area.
08.06cIs a minimum of one toilet facility provided for each group of 20 employees?Yes55Yes.
08.06dDo toilet facilities have visuals or signs, written in the appropriate languages, reminding employees to wash their hands before returning to work?Yes22Yes. Toilets have signs, written in the appropriate languages, reminding to employees to wash their hands before returning to work
08.06eAre the toilets maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and are there records showing toilet cleaning, servicing and stocking is occurring regularly?Yes1010Yes. The toilets were kept clean and service records were available for review.
08.06fAre the catch basins of the toilets designed and maintained to prevent contamination in the field (e.g. free from leaks and cracks)?Yes55Yes. The catch basins of the toilets were free from leaks and cracks.
08.06gIs there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination?Yes55Yes.
08.07Is there evidence of human fecal contamination in the growing area? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020No. There was not evidence of human and/or animal fecal contamination in the growing area.
08.08Are there operational hand washing facilities provided? If No, go to 8.09Yes1515Yes.
08.08aAre the hand washing facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010Yes. The hand washing facilities are integrated to the toilets.
08.08bAre hand wash stations clearly visible (e.g. situated outside the toilet facility) and easily accessible to workers?Yes00Yes. The hand wash stations are visible, situated outside the toilet facility and easily accessible to workers.
08.08cAre hand wash stations properly stocked with soap, paper towels and trash can?Yes55Yes. Hand wash stations are properly stocked with soap, paper towels and trash cans.
08.08dAre the hand wash stations designed and being maintained to prevent contamination onto the growing area ( i.e. spent water does not go straight to the ground)?Yes55Yes. The rinsing water is captured in the toilet's tank.
08.08eDoes the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy and procedure in place requiring employees to wash their hands (e.g. prior to beginning work, after breaks, after toilet use)?Yes1010Yes.
08.09Is fresh potable drinking water provided for workers? If No, go to 8.10Yes1010Yes. Potable drinking water is provided for workers.
08.09aIf used, are water containers maintained in a clean condition?Yes55Yes. Water containers are kept in a clean condition.
08.10Are first-aid kits available and is the inventory maintained properly?Yes55Yes. First-aid kits were available and properly stocked.
08.11Are there trash cans available on the farm placed in suitable locations?Yes55Yes. Trash cans are provided.
08.12Are there any foreign material issues observed that are or could be potential risks to the product in the growing area (e.g jewelry)?No55No. Foreign material issues were not observed.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Food Security
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
09.01Are measures taken to control vehicle access to the growing area? (specified access roads, furrows, etc)?Yes55Yes. The Ranch has specified access roads.
09.02Are postings such as "No Trespassing" and/or " Restricted Entry" used appropriately?Yes55Yes. Postings are used.
09.03Are entrances to ranch-level roads restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.?Yes55Yes. Entrances to ranch-level roads are restricted by cables with locks.
09.04Are wells or other water sources secured and designed to prohibit tampering?Yes55Yes.
09.05Are grounds and facilities monitored by either in house or contracted personnel?Yes55Yes. Grounds are monitored by in house personnel.
09.06Are staff members instructed to note and report suspicious activity?Yes55Yes.
09.07Are high risk areas (e.g. spray equipment, equipment shops, sheds) monitored?Yes55Yes.
09.08Is equipment examined for tampering prior to use?Yes55Yes.
09.09Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdfNo. Security training records, were not available for review.
09.10Is education material related to security made available?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdfNo. Education material related to security, was not available.
09.11Are inventory records of agricultural chemicals maintained? If No, go to 9.12N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Agricultural chemicals handling is contracted with an external company.
09.11aAre the inventory records periodically reconciled with inventory?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Refer to 09.11
09.12Are all personal materials kept away from the harvest and packaging of  the harvesting operation?N/A00N/A. Score is not affected. Harvest and packaging were not observed.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.


Audit Scoring Summary
Self InspectionScore12
Possible Points12
Percent Score100%
TraceabilityScore15
Possible Points15
Percent Score100%
Ground HistoryScore34
Possible Points34
Percent Score100%
Adjacent Land UseScore55
Possible Points65
Percent Score85%
Fertilizer/Crop NutritionScore115
Possible Points130
Percent Score88%
Irrigation/Water UseScore199
Possible Points206
Percent Score97%
Crop ProtectionScore150
Possible Points150
Percent Score100%
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)Score232
Possible Points232
Percent Score100%
TotalScore812
Possible Points844
Percent Score96%

Food Security Scoring Summary
Food SecurityScore40
Possible Points50
Percent Score80%
TotalScore40
Possible Points50
Percent Score80%