* Powered By Google

Version 4.0 Sep 19, 2009

PrimusLabs Audit (108841)
Ranch v07.04
Customer(s)Apio, Inc.
    Contact:Travis Barnett
    Guadalupe California 93434
    United States
    Phone Number: 805-249-5340 Fax Number: 805-249-6472
    Email(s):tbarnett@apioinc.com
Pacific International Marketing/Dynasty Farms
    Contact: Sharan Lanini
    Address: P.O. Box 3737
    Salinas California 93912
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-755-1398 Fax Number: 831-422-0960
    Email(s):Aanderson@pim4u.com;Liliana@pim4u.com;vinny@pim4u.com
Acquistapace Farms, Inc
    Contact:Jim Acquistapace
    Address: 1635 N Blosser Rd.
    Santa Maria California 93458
    United States
    Phone Number: 805-614-6100 Fax Number: 805-614-6177
    Email(s):-
Grower(s)Acquistapace Farms, Inc
    Contact:Fred Keller
    Address: 1635 North Blosser,
    Santa Maria California 93458
    United States
    Phone Number: (805) 614-6100 Fax Number: (805) 614-6177
    Email(s):ffvinc@msn.com
Ranch(s)Acquistapace Ranch 20
    Address: 1635 North Blosser
    Santa Maria California 93458
    United States
Facility(s)Taylor Farms - Hansen
    Contact:Joshua Tamayo
    Address: 1275 Hansen Street, Salinas CA 93901
    Salinas California 93901
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-676-9582 Fax Number: 831-676-9502
    Email(s):jtamayo@taylorfarms.com
Audit Type:Farm/Ranch
Foreman or Contact Person (and email):Fred Keller
Location/City:Santa Maria
State:California
Country:United States
Date Audit Started:08/18/2009 08:30
Date Audit Finished:08/18/2009 15:25
Commodity(ies):Celery, Cauliflower, Lettuce, Butter Lettuce (Butterhead), Broccoli, Romaine Lettuce, Broccoli, Lettuce
Auditor:Orlando Dominguez (PrimusLabs Auditors)
Audit Percentage Score:99%
Announced Audit?Yes
Audit Scope:N/A
Audit Entered By:Orlando Dominguez
Other Auditing Personnel And Role:N/A
GPS Coordinates:Latitude:Length:
34° 54' 58"120° 22' 58"
34° 54' 58"120° 22' 46"
34° 54' 42"120° 22' 59"
34° 54' 50"120° 22' 46"


Self Inspection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
01.01Have Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) manuals covering each growing area within the scope of this audit (e.g., growing operation, orchard, vineyard) been developed and are they available for review?Yes55Yes. GAP manual was available for review.
01.02Have documented Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)self-audits been completed for each growing area that is within the scope of this audit (e.g. growing operation, orchard, vineyard)?Yes77Yes. Made on 08/14/09.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Traceability
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
02.01Is the growing area(s) adequately identified or coded to enable trace back and trace forward in the event of a recall?Yes1515Yes. The growing area is located on maps and identified by assigned block numbers.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Ground History
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
03.01Were farming area(s) used for growing food crops for human consumption last season?Yes00Yes. More than 3 years.
03.02Has the growing area(s) been used for any non-agricultural functions? If No, go to 3.03No77
03.02aIf the land had been used previously for non-agricultural functions have soil tests been conducted showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00
03.03Has the growing area(s) been used for animal husbandry or grazing land for animals? If No, go to 3.04No77
03.03aIf the land was used previously for animal husbandry or grazing land for livestock, has a risk evaluation been performed?N/A00
03.04Is there any evidence of animal activity in the crop that is a potential food safety risk?No2020No. Auditor did not observed any evidence of this issue during the tour.
03.05Has flooding from uncontrolled causes occurred on the growing area(s) since the previous growing season? If No, go to 3.06No00
03.05aIf the growing area(s) and product was affected from the flood waters, is there documented evidence that corrective measures were taken to affected land and product?N/A00
03.05bHave soil tests been conducted on the flooded area(s) showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00
03.06Is the growing operation under organic principles? If No , go to 3.07Yes00Yes. Ranch is operate under organic principles.
03.06aIs current certification by an accredited organic certification organization on file and available for review?Yes00Yes. Certified by CCOF.
03.07If the growing area(s) is a new purchase or lease, has a documented risk assessment been undertaken?N/A00

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Adjacent Land Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
04.01Is the adjacent land to the growing area a possible source of contamination from intensive livestock production (e.g. feed lots, dairy operations, poultry houses, meat rendering operation)? If No, go to 4.02No1010No. There are not livestock production around the field blocks.
04.01aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate this possible contamination source onto the growing area (e.g. buffer areas, physical barriers, fences, ditches, etc.)?N/A00N/A. see question 4.01
04.02Are, or is there evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) in proximity to growing operation? If No, go to 4.03No1010No. There are houses near to operation but the auditor was not observed any domestic animal during the tour.
04.02aHave physical measures been put in place to restrain domestic animals, grazing lands, (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) and their waste from entering the growing area (e.g. vegetative strips, wind breaks, physical barriers, berms, fences, diversion ditches.)?N/A00N/A. see question 4.02
04.02bIs there a written policy supported by visual evidence that domestic, livestock, or wild animals are not allowed in the growing area? Note: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.N/A00N/A. see question 4.02
04.02cAre measures in place to reduce or limit the animal intrusion (i.e., monitoring field perimeter for signs of intrusion)?N/A00N/A. see question 4.02
04.03Are untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land? If No, go to 4.04No1010No. No untreated animal manure, compost, etc. on adyacent land.
04.03aHave physical measures been taken to secure untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land?N/A00N/A. see question 4.03
04.03bIf biosolids are stored and/or applied on adjacent land, has the adjacent landowner supplied paperwork confirming the biosolids meet prevailing guidelines, governmental, or local standards?N/A00N/A. see question 4.03
04.04Is the growing area situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations or functions (e.g. leach fields,  runoff or potential flooding from sewers, toilet systems, industrial facilities, labor camps)? If No, go to 4.05No1010
04.04aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate risks related to nearby operations?N/A00N/A. see question 4.04
04.05Is there a documented and implemented policy that infant or toddler aged children are not allowed in the growing area? NOTE: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.Yes1010Yes. Policy was available to review.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
05.01Is untreated human sewage sludge used in the growing cycle? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020No. Untreated human sewage sludge is not used.
05.02Is compost produced from animal derived materials used by the grower? If No, go to 5.03No00No. The grower stated that they not apply any type of compost, and in the route of the land no evidence of compost was observed.
05.02aAre compost applications incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. see question 5.02.
05.02bAre there compost use records available for each growing area, including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?N/A00N/A. see question 5.02.
05.02cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (CoA) from the compost supplier(s) that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing) and does the grower have relevant letters of guarantee regarding SOP's and logs?N/A00N/A. see question 5.02.
05.03Are biosolids used? If No, go to 5.04. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Greens) which ban the use of biosolids, see 5.03dNo00No. Bio-solids are not used.
05.03aAre biosolids incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. see question 5.03.
05.03bAre the grower's biosolids use records available for each growing area, especially application records?N/A00N/A. see question 5.03.
05.03cAre there a Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) from the biosolid supplier(s) certifying compliance with prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. see question 5.03.
05.03dAre biosolids being applied to crops where the country of production regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials e.g. Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines in California? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. see question 5.03.
05.04Is untreated animal manure used? If No, go to 5.05. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines) which ban the use of untreated animal manures. See 5.04dNo1515No. Untreated animal manure is not used.
05.04aIs untreated animal manure incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. see question 5.04.
05.04bAre there untreated animal manure records available for each growing area including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 120 days (unless more stringent laws or guidelines exist)?N/A00N/A. see question 5.04.
05.04cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), specification or some other document available for review provided by the untreated animal manure supplier stating the components of the material?N/A00N/A. see question 5.04.
05.04dAre untreated animal manures being applied to crops where the country regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines)? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. see question 5.04.
05.05Are other nonsynthetic crop treatments used (e.g. compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal,"bio fertilizers")? If No, go to 5.06Yes00Examples include but are not limited to compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal, and "bio fertilizers" that are produced from animal materials.
05.05aAre nonsynthetic treatments that contain animal products or animal manures applied to the edible portions crops?No1515
05.05bAre nonsynthetic crop treatment records available for each growing area including application records demonstrating the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?Yes1515
05.05cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis available from the nonsynthetic crop treatment suppliers that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing)?Yes2020
05.06Are any soil amendments (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers) used that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures? If No, go to 5.07Yes00This refers to soil amendments (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers) used that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures.Yes. They were using gypsum and precipitated calcium carbonated before to planting.
05.06aAre the grower's soil amendment (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures) records available for review including application records?Yes1010
05.06bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) and/or letters of guarantee stating that the materials used are free from animal products and/or animal manures?Yes2020
05.07Are inorganic fertilizers used? If No, go to 5.08No00Examples of manufactured inorganic fertilizers include ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, chemically synthesized urea, etc.
05.07aAre the grower's inorganic fertilizer records available for review including application records?N/A00
05.07bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), letters of guarantee or some other documents from the inorganic fertilizer supplier(s) that specifies the source of all the ingredients including inert materials?N/A00
05.08If fertilizers and/or fertilizer containers are stored on the property, are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination to the growing area(s) or any of water sources?Yes33

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Irrigation/Water Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
06.01Does the growing operation practice dryland farming? If No, go to 6.02.No00This refers to crop production that relies only on direct rainfall.
06.01aIf the growing operation practices dryland farming, are there water systems used in the growing operation to supply for crop needs such as crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02N/A00
06.01bAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.01d.N/A00
06.01cAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.01dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols which include how samples should be identified?N/A00
06.01eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.01fIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.02Is the water used for the growing operation sourced from Municipal or District water pipeline systems? If No, go to 6.03No00(No recommendation)
06.02aAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02c.N/A00
06.02bAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.02cDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.02dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.02eIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.02fAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.02gIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.02hAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00
06.02iAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.03Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from wells? If No, go to 6.04Yes00
06.03aAre all well heads an adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00N/A. No untreated manure on site.
06.03bIs the well designed to prevent contamination?Yes1010
06.03cIs it evident that the well(s) is free from contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of wells?Yes1010
06.03dAre records kept for periodic inspections and treatment of wells (if performed) available for review?Yes77Yes. Records were available for review.
06.03eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.03gYes2020Yes. Conducted by Primuslabs.com
06.03fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?Yes1515Yes. Water tests are conducted on a monthly basis.
06.03gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?Yes1010Yes. Procedures were available for review.
06.03hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?Yes1010Yes. Included in the GAP manual.
06.03iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. No unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected.
06.03jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?Yes00
06.03kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.No00
06.03lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?No00
06.03mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?No00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.
06.04Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from ponds, reservoirs, watersheds or other surface water source? If No, go to 6.05No00
06.04aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00
06.04bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?N/A00
06.04cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?N/A00
06.04dAre records kept for the periodic visual inspections and disinfection treatments (if used) available for review?N/A00
06.04eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.04gN/A00
06.04fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.04gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.04hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.04iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.04jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.04kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.04lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00
06.04mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.05Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from canals, rivers, ditches, or other open flowing water systems? If No, go to 6.06No00
06.05aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00
06.05bIs the water source under the direction of a water authority or district?N/A00
06.05cDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?N/A00
06.05dIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?N/A00
06.05eAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?N/A00
06.05fAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.05hN/A00
06.05gAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.05hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.05iDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.05jIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.05kAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.05lIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.05mAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?N/A00
06.05nAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.06Is reclaimed water used in the growing operation? NOTE: This refers to wastewater that has gone through a treatment process. If No, go to 6.07.No00
06.06aIs the reclamation process under the direction of a water reclamation management or authority?N/A00
06.06bAre microbial control measures for reclaimed water utilized?N/A00
06.06cAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.06eN/A00
06.06dAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.06eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.06fDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.06gIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.06hAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.06iIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.06jAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00
06.06kAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.07Are tail water (run off water) systems used in the growing operation? If No, go to 6.08.No00
06.07aIs tail water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00
06.07bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the tail water systems?N/A00
06.07cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the tail water system?N/A00
06.07dAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?N/A00
06.07eAre microbial tests conducted, including Generic E.coli on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.07gN/A00
06.07fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00
06.07gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00
06.07hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00
06.07iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00
06.07jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00
06.07kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00
06.07lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?N/A00
06.07mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00
06.08Are check valves, anti-siphon devices, or other back flow prevention systems in use when and where necessary?Yes1010Yes. Check valves are installed as permanenet fixtures.
06.09Is irrigation equipment not in use free from pest contamination and stored clean off the ground?Yes1010

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Crop Protection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
07.01Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials?Yes55Yes. It's available to review.
07.01aIs mixing, loading, or the dilution of crop protection materials performed safely and within a distance where the growing area and water sources are not affected?N/A00N/A. These activities were not observed. Also the crop protection applications are made by a subcontracted company.
07.02Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment?Yes55Yes. Policy was available for review
07.02aIs rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment performed safely and within a distance where land and water sources are not affected?N/A00N/A. These activities were not observed during the audit.
07.03Is there documentation that shows the individual(s) making decisions for crop protection are qualified?Yes1010Yes. PCA licence #74314 from Larry A. Evans.
07.04Is there documentation that shows employees who handle crop protection materials are trained or are under the supervision of a trained individual?Yes1515Yes. Documents available during the inspection.
07.05Does the growing operation follow a pesticide application recording program? If No, go to 7.06 If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. Pesticide Use Records (PURs) was completed for each application.
07.05aAre crop protection application records up to date and available for review?Yes1515
07.06Are crop protection materials registered in the country of use for the target crop where official registration is in place? If this question is answered Yes, skip to question 7.07. If no official registration system is utilized answer this question N/A and go to 7.06a. Where a system exists, but a crop protection chemical being used is not registered for the target crop either "in country" or by extrapolation (see 7.06a), the response to this question is No. If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020
07.06aDoes the country of production allow the use of crop protection materials that are registered for the target crop in another country, as long as the use of this material does not contravene any prevailing national and local laws in the destination country (e.g. maximum residue limit, banned lists, etc.)? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00
07.07Are crop protection applications restricted by the guidelines established by the product label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. Product label restrictions are indicated.
07.08Where harvesting is restricted by pre-harvest intervals (as required on the crop protection chemical product labels, manufacturer recommendations and/or by prevailing national/ local standards) is the grower adhering to these pre-harvest interval time periods? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. PHI (pre-harvest intervals) are listed on pesticide use records.
07.09Are employee re-entry intervals established as required by the pesticide label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?Yes1010Yes, applicators and harvest crew seem to know and follow the guidelines for pesticides application, reentry and harvesting intervals.
07.10When crop protection applications occur, does posting take place on area of treatment according to prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?Yes1010
07.11To avoid drift, are crop protection applications restricted when gusts are excessive?Yes1010
07.12If crop protection containers are stored on the property (even temporarily), are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination and disposed of responsibly?N/A00N/A. The crop protection empty containers are not stored on the property, because the subcontracted company picks up the containers after each application.
07.13Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)?Yes1010Yes. Calibration records are on file.
07.13aIs it evident that the equipment used for crop protection applications is in good working order?N/A00N/A. Equipment used for applications was not observed.

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
08.01Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy for dealing with employees who appear to be physically ill, or become ill while working?Yes1010Yes. Written hygiene policies addressing 8.01 through 8.04 have been implemented and are on file for review.
08.02Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy regarding employees with open sores and wounds?Yes1010Yes. See the question 08.01
08.03Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented procedure in place requiring for all commodities that come in contact with blood to be destroyed? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. See the question 08.01
08.04Does the growing operation have documented and implemented policies prohibiting eating, drinking (including gum chewing) using tobacco in the growing area?Yes1010Yes. See the question 08.01
08.05Is there a food safety hygiene training program covering new and existing employees and are there records of these training events?Yes1515Yes. Records were available to review.
08.06Are there operational toilet facilities provided? If NO, go to 8.07. If this question is answered No, the audit will result in an automatic failure.Yes2020
08.06aAre the toilet facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010
08.06bAre toilet facilities in a suitable location to prevent contamination to the growing area?Yes1515
08.06cIs a minimum of one toilet facility provided for each group of 20 employees?Yes55
08.06dDo toilet facilities have visuals or signs, written in the appropriate languages, reminding employees to wash their hands before returning to work?Yes22
08.06eAre the toilets maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and are there records showing toilet cleaning, servicing and stocking is occurring regularly?Yes1010
08.06fAre the catch basins of the toilets designed and maintained to prevent contamination in the field (e.g. free from leaks and cracks)?Yes55
08.06gIs there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination?No05If self contained toilets are used, the toilet basins should be emptied, pumped, and cleaned in a manner to avoid contamination to product, packaging, equipment, and growing areas. Equipment used in emptying/pumping must be in good working order. A documented policy should exist and if occurring at the time of the verification, the policy should be followed.No. Procedure from Bucio Co. was not available during the inspection.
08.07Is there evidence of human fecal contamination in the growing area? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020
08.08Are there operational hand washing facilities provided? If No, go to 8.09Yes1515
08.08aAre the hand washing facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010
08.08bAre hand wash stations clearly visible (e.g. situated outside the toilet facility) and easily accessible to workers?Yes00
08.08cAre hand wash stations properly stocked with soap, paper towels and trash can?Yes55
08.08dAre the hand wash stations designed and being maintained to prevent contamination onto the growing area ( i.e. spent water does not go straight to the ground)?Yes55
08.08eDoes the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy and procedure in place requiring employees to wash their hands (e.g. prior to beginning work, after breaks, after toilet use)?Yes1010Yes. Hand washing policy was available for review. Also this is included on the training program.
08.09Is fresh potable drinking water provided for workers? If No, go to 8.10Yes1010
08.09aIf used, are water containers maintained in a clean condition?Yes55
08.10Are first-aid kits available and is the inventory maintained properly?Yes55
08.11Are there trash cans available on the farm placed in suitable locations?Yes55
08.12Are there any foreign material issues observed that are or could be potential risks to the product in the growing area (e.g jewelry)?No55

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.

Food Security
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
09.01Are measures taken to control vehicle access to the growing area? (specified access roads, furrows, etc)?Yes55
09.02Are postings such as "No Trespassing" and/or " Restricted Entry" used appropriately?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdf
09.03Are entrances to ranch-level roads restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdf
09.04Are wells or other water sources secured and designed to prohibit tampering?Yes55
09.05Are grounds and facilities monitored by either in house or contracted personnel?Yes55
09.06Are staff members instructed to note and report suspicious activity?Yes55
09.07Are high risk areas (e.g. spray equipment, equipment shops, sheds) monitored?Yes55
09.08Is equipment examined for tampering prior to use?Yes55
09.09Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdfNo. Records were not available to review.
09.10Is education material related to security made available?Yes55
09.11Are inventory records of agricultural chemicals maintained? If No, go to 9.12Yes55
09.11aAre the inventory records periodically reconciled with inventory?Yes55
09.12Are all personal materials kept away from the harvest and packaging of  the harvesting operation?Yes55

*Where laws, commodity specific guidelines and/or best practice recommendations exist and are derived from a reputable source, then these practices and parameters should be used. Audit users should allow a degree of risk association if laws, guidelines, best practices, etc., have not been documented.


Audit Scoring Summary
Self InspectionScore12
Possible Points12
Percent Score100%
TraceabilityScore15
Possible Points15
Percent Score100%
Ground HistoryScore34
Possible Points34
Percent Score100%
Adjacent Land UseScore50
Possible Points50
Percent Score100%
Fertilizer/Crop NutritionScore118
Possible Points118
Percent Score100%
Irrigation/Water UseScore102
Possible Points102
Percent Score100%
Crop ProtectionScore170
Possible Points170
Percent Score100%
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)Score227
Possible Points232
Percent Score98%
TotalScore728
Possible Points733
Percent Score99%

Food Security Scoring Summary
Food SecurityScore50
Possible Points65
Percent Score77%
TotalScore50
Possible Points65
Percent Score77%