Audit Preparation
Question No.	Audit Question	Given Answer	Given Score	Possible Score	Recommendation	Auditor Comments	Audio/ Picture
0.01	Have Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) manuals been developed for each growing area (i.e. ranch) that is covered under this audit?	Yes	0	0
0.02	Have self-audits been completed for each growing area (i.e. ranch) that is covered under this audit?	No	0	0	(No recommendation)

Ground History
Question No.	Audit Question	Given Answer	Given Score	Possible Score	Recommendation	Auditor Comments	Audio/ Picture
1.01	Has the ground ever been used for agricultural production (i.e. food, fiber, animal grazing, etc.)? If NO, skip 1.02 and 1.03 and continue with 1.04.	Yes	0	0	Refer to SOP 02-01
1.02	Has the growing area been used for the production of food or fiber crops for five or more years?	Yes	7	7
1.03	Has the growing area ever been used as a feed lot, pasture, or for other animal husbandry?	No	7	7
1.04	Has the growing area been flooded due to natural causes since the previous growing season? If NO, go to 1.05.	No	0	0
1.04a	Were tests conducted showing soil was negative or within the EPA's or appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	N/A	0	0
1.05	Has the growing area ever been used in a non-agricultural function such as a toxic waste site, landfill, mining, or for the extraction of oil or natural gas?	No	5	5
1.06	Have incinerator, industrial waste, or mine tailings ever been applied to or disposed of on the growing area? If no, go to 1.07.	No	5	5
1.06a	Were tests conducted showing soil was negative or within the EPA's or appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	N/A	0	0
1.07	Has the growing area ever been used as a landfill, or toxic waste site? If no, go to 1.08.	No	5	5
1.07a	Were tests conducted showing soil was negative or within the EPA's or appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	N/A	0	0
1.08	If the growing operation is operating under organic principals, have any materials prohibited by the California Organic Foods Act or other certification organization been applied in the 36-month period prior to harvest? If N/A, go to 2.01.	N/A	0	0
1.08a	Is current certification by an approved organic certification organization on file and available for review?	N/A	0	0

Adjacent Land Use
Question No.	Audit Question	Given Answer	Given Score	Possible Score	Recommendation	Auditor Comments	Audio/ Picture
2.01	Is the utilization of the land adjacent to the growing area a possible source of contamination (e.g., runoff from a feed lot, dairy, composting facility, or meat rendering operation)? NOTE: These refer to intensive uses. If NO, go to 2.02.	No	5	5
2.01a	Have measures (e.g., fences, barriers, drainage, etc.) been taken to prevent contamination from adjacent land?	N/A	0	0
2.02	Is livestock in proximity to growing operation? NOTE: This refers to temporary situations including grazing, 4H, FFA, or other projects. If NO , go to 2.03.	Yes	0	5	Refer to SOP 03-01
2.02a	Are fences or other physical barriers adequate to restrain livestock from entering the field?	Yes	5	5
2.03	Are domestic animals (e.g., dogs, horses, ag projects, etc.) in proximity to the growing operation? If NO, go to 2.04.	Yes	0	0	Refer to SOP 03-01
2.03a	Are fences or other physical barriers adequate to restrain domestic animals from entering the field?	Yes	0	0
2.04	Is animal manure stored in adjacent fields? If no, go to 2.05.	No	5	5
2.04a	Have measures been taken to secure the animal manure stored in adjacent fields (i.e., tarped, etc.)?	N/A	0	0
2.05	Is the farm near an industrial site (i.e. chemical, steel, or other manufacturing) or wastewater facility that may emit toxic waste into the surrounding air or waters? If NO , go to 2.06.	No	5	5
2.05a	For facilities that may present a possible contamination source, have the SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act) records been reviewed?	N/A	0	0
2.05b	Are proper pollution control mechanisms in place to prevent emission of toxic waste into surrounding air or waters? The appropriate agency (e.g., SARA, AQMD, etc.) will need to be contacted to insure compliance and verification.	N/A	0	0
2.06	Are bio-solids (sewage sludge) stored or applied in adjacent fields? If NO, go to 2.07.	No	5	5
2.06a	Have measures been taken to restrict the movement of or secure (i.e. covered with tarps or disced into the field) the bio-solids stored or applied in adjacent fields?	N/A	0	0
2.06b	If bio-solids are stored or used in adjacent fields, have they been composted?	N/A	0	0
2.06c	If bio-solids are stored or used in adjacent fields, does it meet EPA Class A or equivalent state or local standards?	N/A	0	0
2.06d	Has the adjacent landowner supplied paperwork confirming the bio-solids meet EPA Class A or equivalent state or local standards?	N/A	0	0
2.07	If the growing operation is operating under organic principles, does a 25-foot (minimum) buffer zone exist between the organic crop and adjacent non-organic land?	N/A	0	0

Fertilizer Usage
Question No.	Audit Question	Given Answer	Given Score	Possible Score	Recommendation	Auditor Comments	Audio/ Picture
3.01	Is compost or animal manure used as a soil supplement and/or nutrient source? If NO, go to 3.03.	No	0	0
3.01a	Is green compost used in the growing operation?	N/A	0	0
3.01b	Is the animal manure composted?	N/A	0	0
3.01c	Are the grower's composted or raw manure records available for review? If NO, go to 3.01g.	N/A	0	0
3.01d	Are the grower's composted or raw animal manure records current?	N/A	0	0
3.01e	Does the composted animal manure meet or exceed the federal, state, or local minimum composting guidelines?	N/A	0	0
3.01f	Is the composted material sterilized?	N/A	0	0
3.01g	Does the grower have a letter of assurance from the compost or manure supplier certifying compliance with federal, state, or local guidelines?	N/A	0	0
3.02	Was compost or manure applied to the growing area this year?	N/A	0	0	Refer to SOP 04-01 & 04-04
3.02a	Are compost or manure applications made during the dormant season or prior to planting?	N/A	0	0
3.02b	Are compost or manure applications incorporated into the soil?	N/A	0	0
3.02c	If the field was fumigated, was it fumigated after compost or manure application to kill pathogens?	N/A	0	0
3.03	Are bio-solids (sewage sludge) used as a soil supplement and/or nutrient source? If NO, go to 3.05.	No	0	0
3.03a	Are the bio-solids composted?	N/A	0	0
3.03b	Are the grower's bio-solids records available for review? If NO, go to 3.03d.	N/A	0	0
3.03c	Are the grower's bio-solids records current?	N/A	0	0
3.03d	Do the bio-solids meet or exceed federal, state, or local guidelines either with regard to composting procedures or microbial levels of E. coli and Salmonella sp.? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	N/A	0	0
3.03e	Does the grower have a letter of assurance form the bio-solids supplier certifying compliance with state or local guidelines?	N/A	0	0
3.04	Were bio-solids applied to the crop this season?	N/A	0	0	Refer to SOP 04-02 & 04-04
3.04a	Are bio-solids applications made in accordance with EPA, state, or local guidelines?	N/A	0	0
3.04b	Are bio-solids applications incorporated into the soil?	N/A	0	0
3.04c	If the field was fumigated, was it fumigated after bio-solids application?	N/A	0	0
3.05	Are chemical fertilizers applied? If NO, go to 3.06.	Yes	0	0
3.05a	Are the grower's chemical fertilizer records available for review? If NO, go to 3.05c.	Yes	3	3
3.05b	Are the grower's chemical fertilizer records current?	Yes	3	3
3.05c	Does the grower have a letter of assurance from the chemical fertilizer supplier that specifies the source of inert ingredients?	No	0	3	Refer to SOP 04-03
3.06	If the growing operation is operating under organic principles, do all fertilizers used comply with the California Organic Foods Act, the Federal Organic Foods Production Act or other certification organization? If not applicable or NO, go to 4.01.	N/A	0	0
3.06a	Are the grower's organic fertilizer records available for review? If NO, go to 3.06c.	N/A	0	0
3.06b	Are the grower's organic fertilizer records current?	N/A	0	0
3.06c	Does the farmer have a letter of assurance from the organic fertilizer supplier?	N/A	0	0

Water Usage
Question No.	Audit Question	Given Answer	Given Score	Possible Score	Recommendation	Auditor Comments	Audio/ Picture
4.01	Is the crop dryland farmed? If YES, go to 5.01.	No	0	0	(No recommendation)
4.02	Is the irrigation water sourced via municipal pipeline? If NO, go to 4.03.	No	0	0	Refer to SOP 05-02
4.02a	Are annual test results of municipal water on file and available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.02b	Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?	N/A	0	0
4.02c	Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program?	N/A	0	0
4.02d	Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?	N/A	0	0
4.02e	Are the crops subirrigated?	N/A	0	0
4.03	Is irrigation water sourced from a well? If NO, go to 4.04.	Yes	0	0
4.03a	Is the well designed to prevent animal (e.g., rodent, bird, etc.) access?	Yes	5	5
4.03b	Are any measures taken to minimize microbial contamination of wells (e.g., visual inspection, periodic chlorination, filtration, rodent control program, etc.) ?	Yes	7	7
4.03c	Are records kept for the periodic visual inspection or chlorination of wells and available for review?	No	0	3	Refer to SOP 05-01
4.03d	Are microbial (e.g., E. coli, total Coliform, fecal Coliform, etc.) tests conducted on well water? If NO, go to 4.03i.	No	0	5	Refer to SOP 05-01
4.03e	When microbial tests are being conducted on a well, are proper sampling protocols being followed?	N/A	0	0
4.03f	Are well water test results available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.03g	Are water test results current?	N/A	0	0
4.03h	Do written policies exist covering corrective measures if high test results on well water are recorded?	N/A	0	0
4.03i	Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?	Yes	0	0
4.03j	Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program?	Yes	0	5	Refer to SOP 05-01
4.03k	Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?	Yes	0	5	Refer to SOP 05-01
4.03l	Are the crops subirrigated?	No	0	0	(No recommendation)
4.03m	Other than for stand establishment, does the irrigation water ever come in contact with the commodity to be harvested?	Yes	0	5	Refer to SOP 05-01
4.04	Is the irrigation water sourced from a pond or reservoir? If NO, go to 4.05.	No	0	0
4.04a	Are measures taken to restrict livestock access to the pond or reservoir (e.g., barriers, fences, etc.)?	N/A	0	0
4.04b	Is there a routine maintenance program for ponds or reservoirs that includes removal of all inappropriate materials (e.g., plant material, trash, animal carcasses etc.)?	N/A	0	0
4.04c	Are any measures taken to minimize microbial contamination of ponds or reservoirs (e.g., visual inspection, periodic chlorination, filtration, rodent control program, etc.)?	N/A	0	0
4.04d	Are the records kept for the periodic visual inspection and chlorination of ponds or reservoirs available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.04e	Are microbial tests (e.g., E. coli, total Coliform, fecal Coliform, etc.) conducted on the pond or reservoir water? If NO, go to 4.04j.	N/A	0	0
4.04f	When microbial tests are being conducted on a pond or reservoir, are proper sampling protocols being followed?	N/A	0	0
4.04g	Are test results of pond or reservoir water available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.04h	Are water test results current?	N/A	0	0
4.04i	Do written policies exist covering corrective measures if high test results of pond or reservoir water are recorded?	N/A	0	0
4.04j	Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?	N/A	0	0
4.04k	Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program?	N/A	0	0
4.04l	Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?	N/A	0	0
4.04m	Are the crops subirrigated?	N/A	0	0
4.04n	Other than for stand establishment, does the irrigation water ever come in contact with the commodity to be harvested?	N/A	0	0
4.05	Is the irrigation water sourced from either canals or ditches? NOTE: This includes all open running water sources such as streams and rivers. If NO, go to 4.06	No	0	0
4.05a	Are the canals or ditches under the direction of the local water district?	N/A	0	0
4.05b	Does livestock have access to canals or ditches?	N/A	0	0
4.05c	Is there a routine maintenance program for canals or ditches that includes removal of all inappropriate materials (e.g., plant material, trash, animal carcasses, etc.)?	N/A	0	0
4.05d	Are any measures taken to minimize microbial contamination of canals or ditches (e.g., visual inspection, periodic chlorination, filtration, rodent control program, etc.)?	N/A	0	0
4.05e	Are records kept for periodic visual inspection or chlorination of canal or ditch water and available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.05f	Are microbial tests conducted on the canal or ditch water? If NO, go to 4.05k	N/A	0	0
4.05g	When microbial tests are being conducted on canal or ditch water, are proper sampling protocols being followed?	N/A	0	0
4.05h	Are the canal or ditch water test results available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.05i	Are water test results current?	N/A	0	0
4.05j	Do written policies exist covering corrective measures for canal or ditch water if high test results are recorded?	N/A	0	0
4.05k	Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?	N/A	0	0
4.05l	Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program?	N/A	0	0
4.05m	Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?	N/A	0	0
4.05n	Are the crops subirrigated?	N/A	0	0
4.05o	Other than for stand establishment, does the irrigation water ever come in contact with the commodity to be harvested?	N/A	0	0
4.06	Is reclaimed (i.e. gray or tertiary) water used on the farm for irrigation? If NO, go to 4.07	No	0	0
4.06a	Is the reclamation process under the direction of the local water district?	N/A	0	0
4.06b	Are microbial control measures (e.g., chlorination, ozone, etc.) for reclaimed water utilized by the water district?	N/A	0	0
4.06c	Are tests (e.g., pH, free chlorine levels, E. coli, etc.) conducted to assure that the reclaimed water harbors no harmful microbes? If NO, go to 4.06l.	N/A	0	0
4.06d	Are tests on the reclaimed water conducted according to a set schedule?	N/A	0	0
4.06e	Are the reclaimed water samples taken from the proper location (e.g.., intake, effluent, etc.)?	N/A	0	0
4.06f	Are the reclaimed water district tests open to grower review?	N/A	0	0
4.06g	Does the farm have a test result review process for reclaimed waters?	N/A	0	0
4.06h	Are test results from reclaimed waters available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.06i	Are water test results current?	N/A	0	0
4.06j	Have the water district and growers agreed on upper and lower control limits for reclaimed waters with regard to the parameters tested?	N/A	0	0
4.06k	Have the water district and growers agreed on corrective measures for reclaimed waters if the control limits are exceeded?	N/A	0	0
4.06l	Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?	N/A	0	0
4.06m	Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program?	N/A	0	0
4.06n	Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?	N/A	0	0
4.06o	Are the crops subirrigated?	N/A	0	0
4.06p	Other than for stand establishment, does the irrigation water ever come in contact with the commodity to be harvested?	N/A	0	0
4.07	Is the irrigation water sourced from reused (i.e. recycled tail water) irrigation water? This question group concerns the use of irrigation tail water that may be reused. If NO, go to 4.08.	No	0	0
4.07a	Are any measures taken to minimize microbial contamination of reused water such as visual inspection, periodic chlorination, filtration, rodent control program, etc.?	N/A	0	0
4.07b	Are records kept for the periodic visual inspection or chlorination of reused water and available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.07c	Are microbial tests conducted on the reused water? If NO, go to 4.07h.	N/A	0	0
4.07d	When microbial tests are being conducted on reused water, are proper sampling protocols being followed?	N/A	0	0
4.07e	Are test results from reused water available for review?	N/A	0	0
4.07f	Are water test results current?	N/A	0	0
4.07g	Do written policies exist covering corrective measures for reused water if high test results are recorded?	N/A	0	0
4.07h	Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?	N/A	0	0
4.07i	Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program?	N/A	0	0
4.07j	Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?	N/A	0	0
4.07k	Are the crops subirrigated?	N/A	0	0
4.07l	Other than for stand establishment, does the irrigation water ever come in contact with the commodity to be harvested?	N/A	0	0
4.08	Are fertilizers applied by irrigation?	Yes	0	0	Refer to SOP 05-02
4.09	Are pesticides applied by irrigation?	No	0	0
4.10	Are check valves utilized to prevent back flow?	Yes	5	5
4.11	Does the farm have a written Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) which restricts the storage, loading, mixing, or dilution, of agricultural chemicals near the water sources?	Yes	5	5
4.12	Does the farm have a written Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) that restricts the cleaning of spray tanks and related equipment near the water sources?	Yes	5	5

Pest Control Usage
Question No.	Audit Question	Given Answer	Given Score	Possible Score	Recommendation	Auditor Comments	Audio/ Picture
5.01	Is a state licensed Pest Control Advisor (PCA) or an equivalent professional recommendation obtained prior to applying pesticides?	Yes	5	5
5.02	Is a state licensed custom applicator's services or equivalent utilized for some or all applications?	Yes	3	3
5.03	Does the growing operation have a state certified or county licensed employee or equivalent for in-house pesticide applications? The response will be NA if the growing operation does not make in-house applications.	N/A	0	0
5.04	Is the water source used for pesticide spray applications potable or of suitable agricultural quality?	Yes	10	10
5.04a	If the water used for spray applications is sourced off-site, does the grower have a letter of assurance for the water used by the contract applicator?	N/A	0	0
5.05	Have Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) been developed for pesticide applicators?	Yes	5	5
5.06	Does the farming operation follow a 100% pesticide application reporting program for those items required to be reported by state or local guidelines? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	Yes	15	15
5.07	Are pesticide application records available for review? If NO, go to 5.08.	Yes	3	3
5.07a	Are pesticide application records current?	Yes	3	3
5.08	Of the pesticides used, are they restricted to those registered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, state, or local agencies? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	Yes	20	20
5.09	Are pesticide applications restricted by the guidelines established by the product label as well as local, state, and federal laws and regulations? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	Yes	20	20
5.09a	Are pesticide applications limited by EPA, state, or local guidelines designed to protect potential ground water contamination?	Yes	5	5
5.09b	Is harvesting restricted by time intervals established by the EPA as stated on the product's label? (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	Yes	20	20
5.09c	Is employee reentry limited by guidelines established by the registrant and approved by the US EPA as stated on the product's label?	Yes	10	10
5.09d	Are fields posted when category one materials are applied?	Yes	5	5
5.09e	Are ground and aerial pesticide applications restricted when gusts are excessive?	Yes	5	5
5.10	If pesticide containers are stored on the property, are they stored in a secure location?	N/A	0	0
5.11	Are empty pesticide containers disposed of according to the label or state requirements?	N/A	0	3	Refer to SOP 06-02
5.12	Have SOPs been developed for routine pesticide application equipment inspections and replacement?	Yes	5	5
5.13	Is an Integrated Pest Management program established? (This may consist of various elements including field scouting, the use of beneficials, biological pesticides, etc.)	Yes	3	3
5.14	If the growing operation is operating under organic principles, do all pesticides used comply with the California Organic Foods Act and the Federal Organic Foods Production Act? If NA, go to 6.01.	N/A	0	0
5.14a	Are organic pesticide application records available for review? If NO, go to 6.01.	N/A	0	0
5.14b	Are organic pesticide application records current?	N/A	0	0

Employee Safety & Hygiene
Question No.	Audit Question	Given Answer	Given Score	Possible Score	Recommendation	Auditor Comments	Audio/ Picture
6.01	Does the growing operation have a written policy for dealing with employees who appear to be sick?	Yes	5	5
6.02	Does the growing operation have a written policy regarding employees with open wounds?	Yes	5	5
6.03	Does the growing operation have a written policy prohibiting eating in all actively harvested areas?	Yes	3	3
6.04	Does the growing operation have a written policy prohibiting use of tobacco products in all actively harvested areas?	Yes	3	3
6.05	Does the growing operation's Standard Operating Procedures include guidelines and expectations regarding employee hygiene? If NO, go to 6.10.	Yes	3	3
6.06	Are employee educational sessions provided for employees on a scheduled basis?	Yes	7	7
6.07	Are the employee hygiene educational sessions formalized in an outline format?	Yes	3	3
6.08	Are the employee hygiene educational sessions attendance records (signed by the employees) available for review?	Yes	5	5
6.09	Are the employee hygiene educational session attendance records current?	Yes	3	3
6.10	Are toilet facilities provided? If NO, go to 6.21 (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	Yes	15	15
6.11	Are separate toilet facilities provided for men and women in groups larger than 5 employees?	Yes	5	5
6.12	Is a minimum of one toilet facility provided for each group of 20 employees?	Yes	10	10
6.13	Are toilet facilities placed at or within ¼ mile of all employees?	Yes	10	10
6.14	Do toilet facilities have visuals or signs, written in the appropriate languages, reminding employees to wash their hands before returning to work?	Yes	5	5
6.15	Are toilets constructed of materials that are easy to clean?	Yes	2	2
6.16	Are the toilets construction materials of a light color allowing easy evaluation of cleaning performance?	Yes	2	2
6.17	Are the toilets maintained in a clean condition?	Yes	5	5
6.18	Are the catch basins of the toilets designed to prevent contamination in the field?	Yes	5	5
6.19	Are the toilet catch basins emptied outside the growing area?	Yes	5	5
6.20	Are the toilets supplied with toilet paper?	Yes	10	10
6.21	Is there evidence of fecal contamination in the field? (If response isYes, automatic failure will result)	No	20	20
6.22	Are hand washing facilities provided? If NO, go to 6.28. (If response is NO, automatic failure will result)	Yes	15	15
6.23	Is water made available for hand washing at all facilities?	Yes	10	10
6.24	Is soap made available at all hand washing facilities? If NO, go to 6.26.	Yes	10	10
6.25	Does the soap have bacteriostatic properties?	Yes	5	5
6.26	Are single-use towels available at all hand washing facilities?	Yes	10	10
6.27	Are the hand wash stations designed to capture rinse water or prevent contamination in the field, to harvesting equipment (e.g. ladders, etc.), or to the harvested crop?	Yes	5	5
6.28	Are there written policies with corrective action guidelines requiring employees to wash their hands prior to beginning work after break periods, or after using the toilet facilities?	Yes	5	5
6.29	Are employees washing their hands prior to beginning work?	Yes	3	3
6.30	Are the employees washing their hands after break periods?	Yes	5	5
6.31	Are the employees washing their hands after using the toilet facilities?	Yes	10	10
6.32	Is fresh drinking water provided for field workers?	Yes	7	7
6.33	Are the water containers periodically cleaned?	Yes	5	5
6.34	Are single-use paper cups or a drinking fountain available for employees?	Yes	7	7
6.35	Are garbage cans provided in the field for the disposal of food and beverage containers, cups, and paper towels?	Yes	5	5
6.36	Are garbage cans constructed and maintained (e.g., lids, bags, etc.) in such a manner that protects against preharvest or post harvest contamination of the crop?	Yes	5	5
6.37	Are first-aid kits available? If NO, go to 6.39.	Yes	5	5
6.38	Is the inventory of the first-aid kits maintained?	Yes	3	3
6.39	Is there a written policy requiring all commodities that come in contact with blood are destroyed?	Yes	20	20
6.40	Is there a written policy requiring all commodities that are dropped on the ground discarded?	Yes	0	0
6.41	Is there a written policy prohibiting domestic animals in the growing area?	Yes	0	0
6.42	Is there a written policy prohibiting children in the growing area?	Yes	0	0

PrimusLabs Audit (5516) Ranch v4.00
Customer(s)	NewStar Fresh Foods, LLC Contact:Thea Eubanks Address: P.O. Box 5999 Salinas California 93901 United States Phone Number: 831-784-6646 Fax Number: 831-758-7876 Email(s):jbautista@newstarfresh.com
Grower(s)	Costa Farms Inc. Contact:Berthita Meza Address: 36817 Foothill Rd. Salinas Colorado 93960 United States Phone Number: 831-678-0799 Fax Number: N/A Email(s):berthita@costafarmsinc.com
Ranch(s)	Binsacca (Costa Farms Inc) Address: 1 Soledad California United States Salmina (Costa Farms Inc.) Address: 1 Soledad California United States Thompson (Costa Farms Inc.) Address: 1 Soledad California United States Madonna Soledad California United States Lindstrand (Costa Farms Inc.) Address: 1 Soledad California United States Anderson (Costa Family Farms) Address: Soledad California United States Home (Costa Family Farms) Address: Soledad California United States Violini (Triangle Ranch #30) Address: California United States Balemi (Costa Farms Inc.) Address: 1 Soledad California United States Roddick (Costa Family Farms) Address: Soledad California United States Barloggi Soledad California United States Lanini (Costa Farms Inc.) Address: 1 Soledad California United States
Audit Type:	Farm/Ranch
Foreman or Contact Person (and email):	David Costa
Location/City:	Soledad
State:	California
Country:	United States
Date Audit Started:	04/17/2000 14:01
Date Audit Finished:	04/17/2000 14:01
Commodity(ies):	Lettuce
Auditor:	Raymond Guerra ()
Audit Percentage Score:	94%
Scoring Category:	85-94% Excellent
Announced Audit?	No
Audit Scope:

Audit Scoring Summary
	Audit Preparation	Score	0
		Possible Points	0
		Percent Score	0%
	Ground History	Score	29
		Possible Points	29
		Percent Score	100%
	Adjacent Land Use	Score	25
		Possible Points	30
		Percent Score	83%
	Fertilizer Usage	Score	6
		Possible Points	9
		Percent Score	67%
	Water Usage	Score	27
		Possible Points	50
		Percent Score	54%
	Pest Control Usage	Score	137
		Possible Points	140
		Percent Score	98%
	Employee Safety & Hygiene	Score	266
		Possible Points	266
		Percent Score	100%
	Total	Score	490
		Possible Points	524
		Percent Score	94%