* Powered By Google

Version 1.0 Jul 05, 2011

PrimusLabs Audit (148544)
Ranch V07.04 Rev. 1
Customer(s)Duda Farm Fresh Foods, Inc.
    Contact:Amy Kinder-Duda
    Address: 1200 Duda Trail
    Oviedo Florida 32765
    United States
    Phone Number: 407-365-2111 Fax Number: 407-365-2010
    Email(s):amy.duda-kinder@duda.com
Church Brothers, LLC
    Contact:Megan Chedwick
    Address: P.O Box 509, United States, California, Salinas,
    Salinas California 93902
    United States
    Phone Number: 8316821022
    Email(s):megan@churchbrothers.com
Dole Fresh Vegetables Inc.
    Contact: Ashley Avilla
    Address: 639 S Sanborn Pl
    Salinas California 93901
    United States
    Phone Number: (831) 754-3410
    Email(s):Ashley.Avilla@dole.com; juanita.ceja@dole.com
Sunridge Farms Inc DBA Coastline
    Contact:Ralph Treadway
    Address: 4650 Hwy 111, Brawley, CA, 92227
    Salinas California 93912
    United States
    Phone Number: 831 760-7121 Fax Number: 831 755-8719
    Email(s):ralph@coastlineproduce.com
Grower(s)Merril Farms
    Contact: Caitlin Lewis
    Address: P.0. Box 659, Salinas, Ca.
    Salinas California 93902
    United States
    Phone Number: 831 262 76 75
Ranch(s)Spreckles (Merrill Farms)
    Address: 83 Harkins Rd.
    Salinas California 93908
    United States
Facility(s)Taylor Farms - Hansen
    Contact:Joshua Tamayo
    Address: 1275 Hansen Street, Salinas CA 93901
    Salinas California 93901
    United States
    Phone Number: 831-676-9582 Fax Number: 831-676-9502
    Email(s):jtamayo@taylorfarms.com
Audit Type:Farm/Ranch
Foreman or Contact Person (and email):Caitlin Soto
Location/City:Salinas
State:California
Country:United States
Date Audit Started:06/22/2011 15:00
Date Audit Finished:06/22/2011 16:00
Commodity(ies):Butter Lettuce (Butterhead), Lettuce, Lettuce, Lettuce, Broccoli, Cauliflower, Lettuce, Celery
Auditor:Rebeca Perez (PrimusLabs Auditors)
Audit Percentage Score:100%
Announced Audit?Yes
Audit Scope:Field production, GAP policies and procedures, fertiliser applications, employees training, water sources and toilets for field production.
Audit Entered By:Rebeca Perez Z.


Self Inspection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
01.01Have Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) manuals covering each growing area within the scope of this audit (e.g., growing operation, orchard, vineyard) been developed and are they available for review?Yes55Yes. The manual is developed per Merril Farms, policies, procedures, documentation, and records are specific for the farm.
01.02Have documented Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)self-audits been completed for each growing area that is within the scope of this audit (e.g. growing operation, orchard, vineyard)?Yes77Yes. Self audit are done per Caitlin Soto, available for review at the time of the visit.

Traceability
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
02.01Is the growing area(s) adequately identified or coded to enable trace back and trace forward in the event of a recall?Yes1515Yes. At the time of the visit, the farm has maps to identifying the growing areas. Records are implemented using the identification numbers.

Ground History
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
03.01Were farming area(s) used for growing food crops for human consumption last season?Yes00Yes. All the growing areas have been used for crops production the last season.
03.02Has the growing area(s) been used for any non-agricultural functions? If No, go to 3.03No77No. Crop production for the last years.
03.02aIf the land had been used previously for non-agricultural functions have soil tests been conducted showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00N/A. See 03.02.
03.03Has the growing area(s) been used for animal husbandry or grazing land for animals? If No, go to 3.04No77No. Crop production for the last years.
03.03aIf the land was used previously for animal husbandry or grazing land for livestock, has a risk evaluation been performed?N/A00N/A. See 03.03.
03.04Is there any evidence of animal activity in the crop that is a potential food safety risk?No2020No. There is not evidence of animals in the growing area observed during the audit.
03.05Has flooding from uncontrolled causes occurred on the growing area(s) since the previous growing season? If No, go to 3.06No00No. No flooding ocurred in the last year.
03.05aIf the growing area(s) and product was affected from the flood waters, is there documented evidence that corrective measures were taken to affected land and product?N/A00N/A. See 03.05.
03.05bHave soil tests been conducted on the flooded area(s) showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants?N/A00N/A. See 03.05.
03.06Is the growing operation under organic principles? If No , go to 3.07No00Definition for "organic principles": A system that relies on ecosystem management rather than external agricultural inputs. http://www.fao.org/ORGANICAG/fram11-e.htmNo. Ranch operation not under organic principles.
03.06aIs current certification by an accredited organic certification organization on file and available for review?N/A00N/A. See 03.06.
03.07If the growing area(s) is a new purchase or lease, has a documented risk assessment been undertaken?N/A00N/A. No new areas in the field in the last 12 months.

Adjacent Land Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
04.01Is the adjacent land to the growing area a possible source of contamination from intensive livestock production (e.g. feed lots, dairy operations, poultry houses, meat rendering operation)? If No, go to 4.02No1010No. There are not animal production areas in the adjacent lands.
04.01aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate this possible contamination source onto the growing area (e.g. buffer areas, physical barriers, fences, ditches, etc.)?N/A00N/A. There are not animal production areas in the adjacent lands.
04.02Are, or is there evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) in proximity to growing operation? If No, go to 4.03No1010No. During the audit were not observed animals in the adjacent lands.
04.02aHave physical measures been put in place to restrain domestic animals, grazing lands, (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) and their waste from entering the growing area (e.g. vegetative strips, wind breaks, physical barriers, berms, fences, diversion ditches.)?N/A00N/A. During the audit were not observed animals in the adjacent lands.
04.02bIs there a written policy supported by visual evidence that domestic, livestock, or wild animals are not allowed in the growing area? Note: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.N/A00N/A. During the audit were not observed animals in the adjacent lands.
04.02cAre measures in place to reduce or limit the animal intrusion (i.e., monitoring field perimeter for signs of intrusion)?N/A00N/A. During the audit were not observed animals in the adjacent lands.
04.03Are untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land? If No, go to 4.04No1010No. During the audit were not observed manure piles, compost or biosolids in the adjacent lands.
04.03aHave physical measures been taken to secure untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land?N/A00N/A. During the audit were not observed manure piles, compost or biosolids in the adjacent lands. Score is not affected.
04.03bIf biosolids are stored and/or applied on adjacent land, has the adjacent landowner supplied paperwork confirming the biosolids meet prevailing guidelines, governmental, or local standards?N/A00N/A. During the audit were not observed manure piles, compost or biosolids in the adjacent lands. Score is not affected.
04.04Is the growing area situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations or functions (e.g. leach fields,  runoff or potential flooding from sewers, toilet systems, industrial facilities, labor camps)? If No, go to 4.05No1010No. The farm is located in a agricultural area.
04.04aHave appropriate measures been taken to mitigate risks related to nearby operations?N/A00N/A. The farm is located in a agricultural area.
04.05Is there a documented and implemented policy that infant or toddler aged children are not allowed in the growing area? NOTE: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas.Yes1010Yes. There is a documented policy that children are not allowed in the growing area.

Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
05.01Is untreated human sewage sludge used in the growing cycle? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020No. No untreated human sewage is used in the farm.
05.02Is compost produced from animal derived materials used by the grower? If No, go to 5.03No00No. No compost application done in the field.
05.02aAre compost applications incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. See 05.02.
05.02bAre there compost use records available for each growing area, including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?N/A00N/A. See 05.02.
05.02cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (CoA) from the compost supplier(s) that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing) and does the grower have relevant letters of guarantee regarding SOP's and logs?N/A00N/A. See 05.02.
05.03Are biosolids used? If No, go to 5.04. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Greens) which ban the use of biosolids, see 5.03dNo00No. Biosolids are not used in the farm.
05.03aAre biosolids incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. Biosolids are not used in the farm.
05.03bAre the grower's biosolids use records available for each growing area, especially application records?N/A00N/A. Biosolids are not used in the farm.
05.03cAre there a Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) from the biosolid supplier(s) certifying compliance with prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. Biosolids are not used in the farm.
05.03dAre biosolids being applied to crops where the country of production regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials e.g. Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines in California? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. Biosolids are not used in the farm.
05.04Is untreated animal manure used? If No, go to 5.05. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines) which ban the use of untreated animal manures. See 5.04dNo1515No. There is not evidence that untreated animal manure was used.
05.04aIs untreated animal manure incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?N/A00N/A. There is not evidence that untreated animal manure was used.
05.04bAre there untreated animal manure records available for each growing area including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 120 days (unless more stringent laws or guidelines exist)?N/A00N/A. There is not evidence that untreated animal manure was used.
05.04cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), specification or some other document available for review provided by the untreated animal manure supplier stating the components of the material?N/A00N/A. There is not evidence that untreated animal manure was used.
05.04dAre untreated animal manures being applied to crops where the country regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines)? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. There is not evidence that untreated animal manure was used.
05.05Are other nonsynthetic crop treatments used (e.g. compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal,"bio fertilizers")? If No, go to 5.06No00No. No nonsynthetic crop treatments are used in the operation.
05.05aAre nonsynthetic treatments that contain animal products or animal manures applied to the edible portions crops?N/A00N/A. See 05.05.
05.05bAre nonsynthetic crop treatment records available for each growing area including application records demonstrating the interval between application and harvest was not less than 45 days?N/A00N/A. See 05.05.
05.05cAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis available from the nonsynthetic crop treatment suppliers that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing)?N/A00N/A. See 05.05.
05.06Are any soil amendments (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers) used that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures? If No, go to 5.07No00No. The farm do not used soil amendments.
05.06aAre the grower's soil amendment (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures) records available for review including application records?N/A00N/A. The farm does not used soil amendments.
05.06bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) and/or letters of guarantee stating that the materials used are free from animal products and/or animal manures?N/A00N/A. The farm does not used soil amendments.
05.07Are inorganic fertilizers used? If No, go to 5.08Yes00Yes.
05.07aAre the grower's inorganic fertilizer records available for review including application records?Yes1010Yes.
05.07bAre there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), letters of guarantee or some other documents from the inorganic fertilizer supplier(s) that specifies the source of all the ingredients including inert materials?Yes77Yes. Letter of guarantee are available for review.
05.08If fertilizers and/or fertilizer containers are stored on the property, are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination to the growing area(s) or any of water sources?Yes33Yes.

Irrigation/Water Use
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
06.01Does the growing operation practice dryland farming? If No, go to 6.02.No00This refers to crop production that relies only on direct rainfall.No. The farm do not practice dryland farming.
06.01aIf the growing operation practices dryland farming, are there water systems used in the growing operation to supply for crop needs such as crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02N/A00N/A. See 06.01.
06.01bAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.01d.N/A00N/A. See 06.01.
06.01cAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. See 06.01.
06.01dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols which include how samples should be identified?N/A00N/A. See 06.01.
06.01eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. See 06.01.
06.01fIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. See 06.01.
06.02Is the water used for the growing operation sourced from Municipal or District water pipeline systems? If No, go to 6.03No00(No recommendation)No. No water for municipal or district pipeline is used in the farm.
06.02aAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.02c.N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02bAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02cDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02dDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02eIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02fAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02gIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02hAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.02iAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. See 06.02.
06.03Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from wells? If No, go to 6.04Yes00Yes. Well water is used in the ranch operation.
06.03aAre all well heads an adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00N/A. No untreate manure is applied or stored in the field. Score is not affected.
06.03bIs the well designed to prevent contamination?Yes1010Yes.
06.03cIs it evident that the well(s) is free from contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of wells?Yes1010Yes. During the visit well was observed free of contaminaton issues.
06.03dAre records kept for periodic inspections and treatment of wells (if performed) available for review?Yes77Yes. Records of inspection done to well are available for review, irrigators are the responsibles to check the wells.
06.03eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.03gYes2020Yes. Test done every month, per example done on May, 2011 lab number AB36844.
06.03fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?Yes1515Yes. Test are done every month, results are available for review.
06.03gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?Yes1010Yes.
06.03hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?Yes1010Yes.
06.03iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. No abnormal or unsuitable results have been detected. Score is not affected.
06.03jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?Yes00Yes. Drip system is used in the farm.
06.03kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.Yes00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.Yes. Overhead irrigation is used in the field.
06.03lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?Yes00Information gathering question. Reducing contact with edible portion of the crop is believed to reduces microbial risk.Yes. Furrow system is used in the farm.
06.03mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. See 06.03j.
06.04Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from ponds, reservoirs, watersheds or other surface water source? If No, go to 6.05No00No. Water from reservoirs, ponds or surface water is not used in the ranch operation.
06.04aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04dAre records kept for the periodic visual inspections and disinfection treatments (if used) available for review?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04eAre microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.04gN/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.04mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. See 06.04.
06.05Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from canals, rivers, ditches, or other open flowing water systems? If No, go to 6.06No00No. Canal or open flowing water is not used in the ranch operation.
06.05aIs surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05bIs the water source under the direction of a water authority or district?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05cDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05dIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05eAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05fAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.05hN/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05gAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05iDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05jIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05kAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05lIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05mAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.05nAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. See 06.05.
06.06Is reclaimed water used in the growing operation? NOTE: This refers to wastewater that has gone through a treatment process. If No, go to 6.07.No00No. The grower does not use reclaim water.
06.06aIs the reclamation process under the direction of a water reclamation management or authority?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06bAre microbial control measures for reclaimed water utilized?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06cAre microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.06eN/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06dAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06eDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06fDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06gIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06hAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06iIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06jAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.06kAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. See 06.06.
06.07Are tail water (run off water) systems used in the growing operation? If No, go to 6.08.No00No. The grower does not use tail water.
06.07aIs tail water in adequate distance from untreated manure?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07bDo animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the tail water systems?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07cIs it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the tail water system?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07dAre records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07eAre microbial tests conducted, including Generic E.coli on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.07gN/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07fAre the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07gDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07hDo written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07iIf unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07jAre the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07kIs overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand.N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07lAre the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.07mAre the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)?N/A00N/A. See 06.07.
06.08Are check valves, anti-siphon devices, or other back flow prevention systems in use when and where necessary?Yes1010Yes.
06.09Is irrigation equipment not in use free from pest contamination and stored clean off the ground?Yes1010Yes. Irrigation equipment is observed clean and off the ground at the time of the audit.

Crop Protection
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
07.01Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials?Yes55Yes. The farm have documented policies and procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials, they are included in the contractors documentation, per example CPS and NH3.
07.01aIs mixing, loading, or the dilution of crop protection materials performed safely and within a distance where the growing area and water sources are not affected?Yes77Yes.
07.02Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment?Yes55Yes. The farm have documented policies and procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment, they are included in the GAP manual.
07.02aIs rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment performed safely and within a distance where land and water sources are not affected?Yes77Yes.
07.03Is there documentation that shows the individual(s) making decisions for crop protection are qualified?Yes1010Yes. The farm operation has 7 approved PCA, per example Andrew Brancandi license number 70272, Tim Benedis license number 74328, among others.
07.04Is there documentation that shows employees who handle crop protection materials are trained or are under the supervision of a trained individual?Yes1515Yes. The farm have trainined employees on the use and application of pesticides, per example Jose Zavala.
07.05Does the growing operation follow a pesticide application recording program? If No, go to 7.06 If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. Pesticide application are available for review.
07.05aAre crop protection application records up to date and available for review?Yes1515Yes.
07.06Are crop protection materials registered in the country of use for the target crop where official registration is in place? If this question is answered Yes, skip to question 7.07. If no official registration system is utilized answer this question N/A and go to 7.06a. Where a system exists, but a crop protection chemical being used is not registered for the target crop either "in country" or by extrapolation (see 7.06a), the response to this question is No. If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. EPA registration.
07.06aDoes the country of production allow the use of crop protection materials that are registered for the target crop in another country, as long as the use of this material does not contravene any prevailing national and local laws in the destination country (e.g. maximum residue limit, banned lists, etc.)? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.N/A00N/A. EPA list are used in the farm. Score is not affected.
07.07Are crop protection applications restricted by the guidelines established by the product label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes.
07.08Where harvesting is restricted by pre-harvest intervals (as required on the crop protection chemical product labels, manufacturer recommendations and/or by prevailing national/ local standards) is the grower adhering to these pre-harvest interval time periods? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. Pre-harvest intervals were reviewed and appear in compliance at the time of the visit.
07.09Are employee re-entry intervals established as required by the pesticide label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?Yes1010Yes. Signs are posted in the farm to indicated "Do not enter"
07.10When crop protection applications occur, does posting take place on area of treatment according to prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines?Yes1010Yes.
07.11To avoid drift, are crop protection applications restricted when gusts are excessive?N/A00N/A. Not observed during the audit. Score is not affected.
07.12If crop protection containers are stored on the property (even temporarily), are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination and disposed of responsibly?Yes1010Yes. Crop protection containers are stored in a control manner.
07.13Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)?Yes1010Yes. Policies and procedures are available for review for the ranch operation.
07.13aIs it evident that the equipment used for crop protection applications is in good working order?Yes1010Yes.

Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
08.01Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy for dealing with employees who appear to be physically ill, or become ill while working?Yes1010Yes. There is a documented evidence of procedures, this topic is included in the GAP manual and the employees know about the rules.
08.02Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy regarding employees with open sores and wounds?Yes1010Yes. There is a documented evidence of procedures, this topic is included in the GAP manual and the employees know about the rules.
08.03Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented procedure in place requiring for all commodities that come in contact with blood to be destroyed? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result.Yes2020Yes. There is a documented evidence of procedures, this topic is included in the GAP manual and the employees know about the rules.
08.04Does the growing operation have documented and implemented policies prohibiting eating, drinking (including gum chewing) using tobacco in the growing area?Yes1010Yes. There is a documented evidence of procedures, this topic is included in the GAP manual (point 1 of "Reglas de Salud y Higiene) and the employees know about the rules.
08.05Is there a food safety hygiene training program covering new and existing employees and are there records of these training events?Yes1515Yes. Per example training done on 6/17/2011 to Samuel Amado, Jose Brisnol, Arturo Baeza, among others.
08.06Are there operational toilet facilities provided? If NO, go to 8.07. If this question is answered No, the audit will result in an automatic failure.Yes2020Yes. A toillet is available for employees in the ranch.
08.06aAre the toilet facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010Yes. At the time of the visit, the farm have portable toilet.
08.06bAre toilet facilities in a suitable location to prevent contamination to the growing area?Yes1515Yes. Located on the roads.
08.06cIs a minimum of one toilet facility provided for each group of 20 employees?Yes55Yes.
08.06dDo toilet facilities have visuals or signs, written in the appropriate languages, reminding employees to wash their hands before returning to work?Yes22Yes. The toilets has signs implemented to remind the employees to wash their hands before returning to work.
08.06eAre the toilets maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and are there records showing toilet cleaning, servicing and stocking is occurring regularly?Yes1010Yes. Toilets are rented to an external company, records of cleaning are available for review.
08.06fAre the catch basins of the toilets designed and maintained to prevent contamination in the field (e.g. free from leaks and cracks)?Yes55Yes.
08.06gIs there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination?Yes55Yes.
08.07Is there evidence of fecal contamination in proximity to the growing area or any storage areas? (This refer to a single account of human or domestic animal fecal matter and/or systematic discoveries of wild animal manure) If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result.No2020No. There is not evidence of fecal contamination in the growing area.
08.08Are there operational hand washing facilities provided? If No, go to 8.09Yes1515Yes. Hand wash stations are available inside chemical toilets.
08.08aAre the hand washing facilities placed within ¼ mile or 5 minutes walking distance of all employees?Yes1010Yes.
08.08bAre hand wash stations clearly visible (e.g. situated outside the toilet facility) and easily accessible to workers?No00So employee's hand washing activities can be verified, hand wash stations should be clearly visible (i.e. situated outside the toilet facility) and easily accessible to workers.No. Hand stations are inside the portable toilet at the time of the audit.
08.08cAre hand wash stations properly stocked with soap, paper towels and trash can?Yes55Yes.
08.08dAre the hand wash stations designed and being maintained to prevent contamination onto the growing area ( i.e. spent water does not go straight to the ground)?Yes55Yes.
08.08eDoes the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy and procedure in place requiring employees to wash their hands (e.g. prior to beginning work, after breaks, after toilet use)?Yes1010Yes.
08.09Is fresh potable drinking water provided for workers? If No, go to 8.10Yes1010Yes.
08.09aIf used, are water containers maintained in a clean condition?Yes55Yes.
08.10Are first-aid kits available and is the inventory maintained properly?Yes55Yes. There are available at the supervisors trucks.
08.11Are there trash cans available on the farm placed in suitable locations?Yes55Yes.
08.12Are there any foreign material issues observed that are or could be potential risks to the product in the growing area (e.g jewelry)?No55No. Use of Jewelry was not observed during the visit.

Food Security
Question No.Audit QuestionGiven AnswerGiven ScorePossible ScoreRecommendationAuditor CommentsAudio/
Picture
09.01Are measures taken to control vehicle access to the growing area? (specified access roads, furrows, etc)?No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdfNo. The farm do not have control vehicle access to the growing area.
09.02Are postings such as "No Trespassing" and/or " Restricted Entry" used appropriately?Yes55Yes. There are signs posted.
09.03Are entrances to ranch-level roads restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.?Yes55No. The entrance to the ranch is not restricted by a gate, chain or guard stations.
09.04Are wells or other water sources secured and designed to prohibit tampering?Yes55Yes.
09.05Are grounds and facilities monitored by either in house or contracted personnel?Yes55Yes.
09.06Are staff members instructed to note and report suspicious activity?Yes55Yes.
09.07Are high risk areas (e.g. spray equipment, equipment shops, sheds) monitored?Yes55Yes.
09.08Is equipment examined for tampering prior to use?Yes55Yes.
09.09Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records?Yes55Yes.
09.10Is education material related to security made available?Yes55Yes.
09.11Are inventory records of agricultural chemicals maintained? If No, go to 9.12No05http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdfNo. The inventory is not available at the time of the audit.
09.11aAre the inventory records periodically reconciled with inventory?N/A00N/A. The inventory is not available at the time of the audit. Score is not affected.
09.12Are all personal materials kept away from the harvest and packaging of  the harvesting operation?Yes55Yes. No personal effected were observed on field operation.


Audit Scoring Summary
Self InspectionScore12
Possible Points12
Percent Score100%
TraceabilityScore15
Possible Points15
Percent Score100%
Ground HistoryScore34
Possible Points34
Percent Score100%
Adjacent Land UseScore50
Possible Points50
Percent Score100%
Fertilizer/Crop NutritionScore55
Possible Points55
Percent Score100%
Irrigation/Water UseScore102
Possible Points102
Percent Score100%
Crop ProtectionScore194
Possible Points194
Percent Score100%
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)Score232
Possible Points232
Percent Score100%
TotalScore694
Possible Points694
Percent Score100%