|
Result Information for Audit Number:
91730 Customer: Duda Farm Fresh Foods, Inc/CA, Duda Farm Fresh Foods, Inc., Sun Coast Farms, LLC, Duda California Ranch: Prina Lots: 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 23 Grower: Gary Wiechens Farms Produce List: Lettuce, Head Crew Name Or Number: N/A Foreman Or Contact Person: Aaron Anderson City / Location: Audit Start: 11/18/2008 09:00 Audit End: 11/18/2008 15:00 Audit Score In Percentage: 90% Average Primus Score: 97% |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are, or is there evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) in proximity to growing operation? If No, go to 4.03 | Examples include chicken coops, dogs, horses, homes with hobby farms, wild pigs etc. Auditor must consider the maturity stage and type of crop involved. For example, pig activity around a ground level berry crop is different from a high level tree crop. | |||||||
| Are postings such as "No Trespassing" and/or " Restricted Entry" used appropriately? | http://www.usda.gov/documents/PreHarvestSecurity_final.pdf | |||||||
| Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials? | Mixing and loading crop protection materials should be done as prescribed by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines. All agricultural chemical additions, dilutions, etc. should be performed safely and within a distance where land and any water source may not be affected. | |||||||
| Is there documentation that shows employees who handle crop protection materials are trained or are under the supervision of a trained individual? | Current valid certificates, licenses, or another form of proof of training recognized by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines should be available for supervisors/ workers handling, mixing/loading/and applying crop protection products . | |||||||
| Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)? | Procedures may include regular calibration, verifications, replacement, and maintenance of the crop protection equipment. | |||||||
| Are the grower's inorganic fertilizer records available for review including application records? | Records should be legible and at least detail date of application, type of fertilizer, amount, method of application (drip, bulk, etc.), and operator name. There should be sufficient identification information in the records that would make it possible to trace an application back to the site if needed. | |||||||
| Do animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source? | Animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) should not have access to the system due to the possibility of contamination occurrences. | |||||||
| Are records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review? | "Records" may include calendar books with commentary regarding what was checked, the condition, unusual occurrences, and any action taken. If using a disinfection injection system (e.g. chlorination), there should be monitoring logs completed on at least a daily basis. The appropriate support documentation should be available for review. | |||||||
| Is there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination? | If self contained toilets are used, the toilet basins should be emptied, pumped, and cleaned in a manner to avoid contamination to product, packaging, equipment, and growing areas. Equipment used in emptying/pumping must be in good working order. A documented policy should exist and if occurring at the time of the verification, the policy should be followed. | |||||||