Report & Corrective Action Summary
 
Audit #: 79612 Audit Type: Ranch v07.04    Customer: Church Brothers, LLC
Ranch: Bryggman Ranch (Monterey Bay Farms), Copley Ranch (Monterey Bay Ranch)
Audit Date: 04/02/2008 Auditor: Javier Sollozo  
Audit Score: 95% Contact Person: Butch Massa/Megan Chedwick  
Product(s): Lettuce, Green Leaf,Lettuce, Head
Audit Scope: Audit scope includes a review of the required food safety files, and a visual survey of the field operations only.
Category
Question
Number
Question
Possible
Points
Given Answer
Given
Points
Auditor Comment
Corrective Action Response
Corrective Action Comment
Self Inspection
01.02
Have documented Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)self-audits been completed for each growing area that is within the scope of this audit (e.g. growing operation, orchard, vineyard)?
7
No
0
No. A documented GAP self-audit was not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.09
Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records?
5
No
0
No. Records were not provided.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.09
Is irrigation equipment not in use free from pest contamination and stored clean off the ground?
10
No
0
No. Some pipes stored in direct contact with the ground.
No Response
No Comments
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
08.05
Is there a food safety hygiene training program covering new and existing employees and are there records of these training events?
15
No
0
No. Records for in-house employees were not available for review. However, records for contractors were provided.
No Response
No Comments
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
08.06g
Is there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination?
5
No
0
No. Toilet service was not observed. Documentation verifying service procedures was not available. There were no observed sites outside the growing area designated [indicated on maps or posted signs] for toilet service.
No Response
No Comments

Audit Scoring Summary
Self InspectionScore5
Possible Points12
Percent Score42%
TraceabilityScore15
Possible Points15
Percent Score100%
Ground HistoryScore34
Possible Points34
Percent Score100%
Adjacent Land UseScore60
Possible Points60
Percent Score100%
Fertilizer/Crop NutritionScore130
Possible Points130
Percent Score100%
Irrigation/Water UseScore92
Possible Points102
Percent Score90%
Crop ProtectionScore180
Possible Points180
Percent Score100%
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)Score212
Possible Points232
Percent Score91%
TotalScore728
Possible Points765
Percent Score95%

Food Security Scoring Summary
Food SecurityScore60
Possible Points65
Percent Score92%
TotalScore60
Possible Points65
Percent Score92%