Report & Corrective Action Summary
 
Audit #: 80423 Audit Type: Ranch v07.04    Customer: Apio, Inc.
Ranch: Ranch 22 (Zest Farms)
Grower: Zest Farms
Audit Date: 04/21/2008 Auditor: Javier Sollozo  
Audit Score: 72% Contact Person: Hector Zepeda/Richard Uranga  
Product(s): Broccoli
Audit Scope: Audit scope includes a review of the required food safety files, and a visual survey of the field operations only.
Category
Question
Number
Question
Possible
Points
Given Answer
Given
Points
Auditor Comment
Corrective Action Response
Corrective Action Comment
Adjacent Land Use
04.02
Are, or is there evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) in proximity to growing operation? If No, go to 4.03
10
Yes
0
Yes. There is grazing land located uphill on the North side of the ranch.
No Response
No Comments
Self Inspection
01.02
Have documented Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)self-audits been completed for each growing area that is within the scope of this audit (e.g. growing operation, orchard, vineyard)?
7
No
0
No. A documented GAP self-audit was not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.02
Are postings such as "No Trespassing" and/or " Restricted Entry" used appropriately?
5
No
0
No Comments
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.03
Are entrances to ranch-level roads restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.?
5
No
0
No Comments
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.04
Are wells or other water sources secured and designed to prohibit tampering?
5
No
0
No Comments
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.07
Are high risk areas (e.g. spray equipment, equipment shops, sheds) monitored?
5
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.08
Is equipment examined for tampering prior to use?
5
No
0
No. Documented verification that the equipment is examined for tampering prior to use was not available.
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.09
Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records?
5
No
0
No. Practice is not implemented.
No Response
No Comments
Crop Protection
07.02
Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment?
5
No
0
No. Policy was not available for review.[Applications are made in-house, and some outside companies are also contracted].
No Response
No Comments
Crop Protection
07.04
Is there documentation that shows employees who handle crop protection materials are trained or are under the supervision of a trained individual?
15
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Crop Protection
07.13
Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)?
10
No
0
No. Calibration, sanitation procedures/events are not documented.
No Response
No Comments
Crop Protection
07.13a
Is it evident that the equipment used for crop protection applications is in good working order?
10
No
0
No. There is intensive bird activity at the yard area where the application equipment is parked.[Auditor observed evidence of bird fecal matter].
No Response
No Comments
Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
05.06a
Are the grower's soil amendment (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures) records available for review including application records?
10
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
05.06b
Are there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) and/or letters of guarantee stating that the materials used are free from animal products and/or animal manures?
20
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
05.07a
Are the grower's inorganic fertilizer records available for review including application records?
10
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition
05.07b
Are there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), letters of guarantee or some other documents from the inorganic fertilizer supplier(s) that specifies the source of all the ingredients including inert materials?
7
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.03b
Is the well designed to prevent contamination?
10
No
0
No. Auditor observed intensive bird activity on top the well head [drops were observed on top the well head]. Trash, oil spill and unattended chemicals were also observed during the tour.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.03c
Is it evident that the well(s) is free from contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of wells?
10
No
0
No. Refer to 06.03b
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.03d
Are records kept for periodic inspections and treatment of wells (if performed) available for review?
7
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.03e
Are microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.03g
20
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.03g
Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?
10
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.09
Is irrigation equipment not in use free from pest contamination and stored clean off the ground?
10
No
0
No. Some pipes were improperly stored directly on the ground. Some pipes located at the yard were stored in proximity to pig's fecal matter waste [aprox. 50 ft]. The yard belongs to another landlord: there are some houses and they own pigs and horses.
No Response
No Comments
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
08.05
Is there a food safety hygiene training program covering new and existing employees and are there records of these training events?
15
No
0
No. Records were not available for review.
No Response
No Comments
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
08.06e
Are the toilets maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and are there records showing toilet cleaning, servicing and stocking is occurring regularly?
10
No
0
No. Trash improperly disposed outside the facilities.
No Response
No Comments
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
08.06g
Is there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination?
5
No
0
No. Toilet service was not observed. Documentation verifying service procedures was not available. There were no observed sites outside the growing area designated [indicated on maps or posted signs] for toilet service.
No Response
No Comments
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)
08.08c
Are hand wash stations properly stocked with soap, paper towels and trash can?
5
No
0
No. Water tank was empty during the visit.
No Response
No Comments

Audit Scoring Summary
Self InspectionScore5
Possible Points12
Percent Score42%
TraceabilityScore15
Possible Points15
Percent Score100%
Ground HistoryScore34
Possible Points34
Percent Score100%
Adjacent Land UseScore80
Possible Points90
Percent Score89%
Fertilizer/Crop NutritionScore38
Possible Points85
Percent Score45%
Irrigation/Water UseScore20
Possible Points87
Percent Score23%
Crop ProtectionScore150
Possible Points190
Percent Score79%
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)Score197
Possible Points232
Percent Score85%
TotalScore539
Possible Points745
Percent Score72%

Food Security Scoring Summary
Food SecurityScore20
Possible Points50
Percent Score40%
TotalScore20
Possible Points50
Percent Score40%