Report & Corrective Action Summary
 
Audit #: 72647 Audit Type: Ranch v07.04    Ranch: Power & Palmer Ranch
Grower: Top Flavor Farms
Audit Date: 11/30/2007 Auditor: Clark Bowdle  
Audit Score: 94% Contact Person: Jon Dinsmore  
Product(s): Kale,Parsley (Herb),Cilantro,Endive,Escaroles / Broad-Leaf Endives
Audit Scope: Ranch Audit of the Power & Palmer Ranch. Shadowed by German Rodriguez of Taylor Farms (Taylor Fresh Foods).
Category
Question
Number
Question
Possible
Points
Given Answer
Given
Points
Auditor Comment
Corrective Action Response
Corrective Action Comment
Adjacent Land Use
04.04
Is the growing area situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations or functions (e.g. leach fields,  runoff or potential flooding from sewers, toilet systems, industrial facilities, labor camps)? If No, go to 4.05
10
Yes
0
Yes, the growing area was situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations or functions (campers).
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.03
Are entrances to ranch-level roads restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.?
5
No
0
No, entrances to ranch-level roads were not restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.04
Are wells or other water sources secured and designed to prohibit tampering?
5
No
0
No, the water sources was not secured and designed to prohibit tampering.
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.09
Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records?
5
No
0
No, company supervisors were not required to undergo documented security training with attendance records.
No Response
No Comments
Food Security
09.10
Is education material related to security made available?
5
No
0
No, education material related to security was not made available.
No Response
No Comments
Crop Protection
07.01
Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials?
5
No
0
No, there was not a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials.
No Response
No Comments
Crop Protection
07.02
Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment?
5
No
0
No, there was not a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment.
No Response
No Comments
Crop Protection
07.13
Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)?
10
No
0
No, documented policies and/or procedures had not been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.05c
Do animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source?
7
Yes
0
Yes, animals (domestic, wild) have access to the water source.
No Response
No Comments
Irrigation/Water Use
06.05h
Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols?
10
No
0
No, written procedures (SOPs) did not exist covering proper sampling protocols.
No Response
No Comments

Audit Scoring Summary
Self InspectionScore12
Possible Points12
Percent Score100%
TraceabilityScore15
Possible Points15
Percent Score100%
Ground HistoryScore34
Possible Points34
Percent Score100%
Adjacent Land UseScore55
Possible Points65
Percent Score85%
Fertilizer/Crop NutritionScore52
Possible Points52
Percent Score100%
Irrigation/Water UseScore92
Possible Points109
Percent Score84%
Crop ProtectionScore194
Possible Points214
Percent Score91%
Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff)Score227
Possible Points227
Percent Score100%
TotalScore681
Possible Points728
Percent Score94%

Food Security Scoring Summary
Food SecurityScore40
Possible Points60
Percent Score67%
TotalScore40
Possible Points60
Percent Score67%